www-webont-wg@w3.org from March 2002 by subject

[www-webont-wg] <none>

ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 14

ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7

ADMIN: current focus group primaries

ADMIN: Face to Face Agenda Update (final agenda Delayed)

ADMIN: minutes for Mar 7 telecon

ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)

ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review)

ADMIN: Modified Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)

Admin: Notes Telecon 28 March

ADMIN: probable regrets

ADMIN: regrets

ADMIN: Regrets for 2002-03-28 telecon

ADMIN: Regrets for 28 March Telecon

ADMIN: Regrets for March 28 Telecon

ADMIN: Sign up please

ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7

ADMIN: updates to 28 Feb minutes

AGENDA: A'dam ftf (draft)

AGENDA: Agenda/Logistics March 21 (please ignore previous)

AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon

AGENDA: telecon Mar 28

ALL: WG schedule

Amsterdam ftf agenda in progress

an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty

Apologies for 2002-03-07 telecon

AW: ADMIN: Sign Up Please

AW: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language

Belated Regrets 3/28 Telecon

belated Regrets for 28 March Telecon

classes as instances

Collection properties, was Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list

comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values

DAML query language

first language proposal

Focus are summary

Good news!

GUIDE: examples

GUIDE: Ontology for a simple XML Infoset

GUIDE: Re: WSCL "well-formerdness" concept

how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...]

http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/dql/

I would like to participate in language features

Integrating XML Schema and OWL

Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

ISSUES: First draft of open issues document.

JOKE: RE: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags

LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL

LANG,GUIDE: Using XQuery types to specify XML valued datatype properties

LANG/GUIDE: XML.com article on DAML [sic]

LANG: A proposal for the layering problem

LANG: classes as instances

LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language

LANG: collections

LANG: daml:collection and owl:seq, owl:set, owl:oneOf

LANG: Example ontology declaring XML Schema equivalence

LANG: feedback on owl proposal

LANG: first sketch

LANG: first sketch & TEST abstract syntax

LANG: frame paradigm

LANG: GEDCOM N3 as RDFxt

LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

LANG: language features

LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax

LANG: ONX round 2 was Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax

LANG: OWL Light and triples

LANG: OWL non-xml syntax

LANG: owl:Ontology

LANG: pushing daml:collection was: Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

LANG: RDF Striped syntax, a reference

LANG: Re: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

LANG: Strawman syntax was RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm)

Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL

minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review

MISC: side event of A'dam ftf

MISC: Workshop on Semantic Web in Design and Engineering

more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL

Moving forward

Next steps (Action: all)

owl:Ontology

parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance?

RDF vs. OWL interpretations

RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) 2002-03-25 (fwd)

rdf:parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

Regrets

Regrets for 21 Mar Teleconf

Regrets for 28 March Teleconf

Regrets for 3/21 Telecon

regrets for 3/7

Regrets for F2F - Stanton - DOD

regrets for tomorrow's telecon

REQDOC: Title change?

REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons?

Requirements document

Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples

Requirements Document back online

requirements document publication in progress

SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list

SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox

SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc

SEM: Formalization exercise

SEM: GUIDE: Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL

SEM: informal note on the layering landscape

SEM: Integrating XML Schema and OWL

SEM: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL

SEM: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it

SEM: semantics for current proposal

SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)

semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]

subgroup telecons?

SUO: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons?

TEST categorize test suites

TEST draft message

TEST, ANN: TRIPLE, and Re: ADMIN: Sign Up Please

TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test

TEST: entailment test cases

TEST: first deliverables

TEST: first steps

TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy)

TEST: RE: Next steps (Action: all)

TEST: sameGuy: it works with TRIPLE

TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use

Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

USE CASES: science applications

WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it)

WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it)

WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags

WOWG: first language proposal

WOWG: first language proposal (shared copyright)

WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue

WOWG: input for telecon on test cases

WOWG: TEST: 2nd draft message

WSCL "well-formerdness" concept

XML datatypes

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 05:46:55 UTC