- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 14:07:49 -0000
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> > Are the use cases Lynn gave within scope? > I am not sure, and no I don't have good answers. I certainly felt more confortable with them that with yours :( sorry. If I had a Jena user in front of me, I think I would encourage them to keep the sets of assertions of different modal contexts separate; probably assign to them URIs, and then have another separate set of assertions that describe the model information. e.g. urn:a = a set of things (that I picked up at Jim's site) urn:b = a set of things (that I picked up at Frank's site) And then I say in some separate bucket "Jim said urn:a" "Frank said urn:b" not satisfactory, and personally I would not be averse to considering a compelling solution to this problem. But even then, I am not clear that such a compelling solution is for this WG rather than some other W3C activity, to be considering. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 09:08:24 UTC