www-webont-wg@w3.org from March 2002 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2002

belated Regrets for 28 March Telecon Ziv Hellman
Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 30 March 2002

Admin: Notes Telecon 28 March Stefan Decker

Friday, 29 March 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jos De_Roo
Re: SUO: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen
LANG: pushing daml:collection was: Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jonathan Borden
REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Leo Obrst
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jeff Heflin
Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jeff Heflin
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Dan Connolly
Re: LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jeff Heflin
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jeff Heflin

Thursday, 28 March 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jonathan Borden
Re: LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Dan Connolly
Re: TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test Jos De_Roo
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Dan Connolly
Belated Regrets 3/28 Telecon Thompson, Lynne R
LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? Jeff Heflin
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jeff Heflin
TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test Dan Connolly
Re: SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Dan Connolly
Re: SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc Dan Connolly
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jeff Heflin
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jeff Heflin
ADMIN: Regrets for March 28 Telecon Said Tabet
Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) Guus Schreiber
ADMIN: Regrets for 28 March Telecon David Trastour
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Guus Schreiber
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jos De_Roo
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Frank van Harmelen
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Deborah McGuinness

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jos De_Roo
AGENDA: A'dam ftf (draft) Guus Schreiber
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jeff Heflin
Regrets for 28 March Teleconf Jonathan Dale
RE: AGENDA: telecon Mar 28 Smith, Michael K
AGENDA: telecon Mar 28 Guus Schreiber
regrets for tomorrow's telecon Leo Obrst
ADMIN: Regrets for 2002-03-28 telecon Nick Gibbins
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Enrico Motta
ALL: WG schedule Guus Schreiber
Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) Guus Schreiber
Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) Guus Schreiber
Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) Jim Hendler
ADMIN: Face to Face Agenda Update (final agenda Delayed) Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden
LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jonathan Borden
Re: comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values Frank van Harmelen
SEM: Formalization exercise Smith, Michael K
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jeff Heflin
comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values Dan Brickley
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Dan Brickley
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 25 March 2002

RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) 2002-03-25 (fwd) Dan Brickley
Amsterdam ftf agenda in progress Dan Connolly
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Dan Connolly
Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue Nick Gibbins
RDF vs. OWL interpretations Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 24 March 2002

WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue Jim Hendler

Monday, 25 March 2002

Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 24 March 2002

Re: LANG: feedback on owl proposal Enrico Motta
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: LANG: ONX round 2 was Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden
LANG: ONX round 2 was Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden

Saturday, 23 March 2002

RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Ian Horrocks
Re: Moving forward Jos De_Roo

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Frank van Harmelen

Saturday, 23 March 2002

Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden
Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Dan Connolly
LANG: A proposal for the layering problem Jeff Heflin
Re: LANG: feedback on owl proposal Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Frank van Harmelen
LANG: feedback on owl proposal Enrico Motta

Saturday, 23 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 23 March 2002

LANG: OWL non-xml syntax Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Dan Connolly
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Frank van Harmelen

Saturday, 23 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 23 March 2002

Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 March 2002

Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Dan Brickley
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review Jeremy Carroll
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Frank van Harmelen
LANG: OWL Light and triples Jeremy Carroll
RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Jeremy Carroll
Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Frank van Harmelen
LANG/GUIDE: XML.com article on DAML [sic] Jim Hendler
LANG: RDF Striped syntax, a reference Jonathan Borden
LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax Jonathan Borden

Thursday, 21 March 2002

Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Dan Connolly
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Ian Horrocks
Re: LANG: classes as instances Lynn Andrea Stein
SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review Dan Connolly
minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review Dan Connolly
RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal Ziv Hellman
Regrets Stefan Decker
Regrets for 21 Mar Teleconf Jonathan Dale
RE: GUIDE: Re: WSCL "well-formerdness" concept Said Tabet
Re: classes as instances Jonathan Borden
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Libby Miller
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Dan Connolly
Re: LANG: classes as instances Peter F. Patel-Schneider
LANG: classes as instances Guus Schreiber
SEM: semantics for current proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
MISC: Workshop on Semantic Web in Design and Engineering ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
GUIDE: Re: WSCL "well-formerdness" concept Jim Hendler
AGENDA: Agenda/Logistics March 21 (please ignore previous) Jim Hendler
[www-webont-wg] <none> Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jonathan Borden
WSCL "well-formerdness" concept Hugo Haas
RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 21 March 2002

re: AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon dieter fensel

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

Re: WOWG: first language proposal Jim Hendler
AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

Re: WOWG: first language proposal Evan Wallace
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
Re: Moving forward Jos De_Roo
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
Re: Moving forward Jos De_Roo
Regrets for F2F - Stanton - DOD Stanton, John
RE: WOWG: first language proposal Jeremy Carroll
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Frank van Harmelen
RE: WOWG: first language proposal Jeremy Carroll
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Moving forward Jeremy Carroll
Re: Moving forward Jos De_Roo
Re: first language proposal Jonathan Borden
Re: WOWG: first language proposal (shared copyright) Dan Connolly
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Frank van Harmelen
Re: WOWG: first language proposal Dan Brickley
WOWG: first language proposal Frank van Harmelen
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 18 March 2002

Re: Moving forward Jos De_Roo
Regrets for 3/21 Telecon Thompson, Lynne R
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 17 March 2002

Re: Moving forward Pat Hayes

Monday, 18 March 2002

RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Smith, Michael K
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jeremy Carroll
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Integrating XML Schema and OWL Jonathan Borden
SEM: Integrating XML Schema and OWL Jonathan Borden
LANG: collections Jonathan Borden
GUIDE: Ontology for a simple XML Infoset Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 17 March 2002

RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Smith, Michael K
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 16 March 2002

Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jeremy Carroll
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jeremy Carroll
RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jeremy Carroll
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
Collection properties, was Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list Jonathan Borden

Friday, 15 March 2002

Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jonathan Borden
Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list Lynn Andrea Stein
MISC: side event of A'dam ftf Guus Schreiber
Re: LANG: frame paradigm Guus Schreiber
Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Dan Connolly
ADMIN: Modified Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) Smith, Michael K
SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox Jeremy Carroll
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 14 March 2002

Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list Jos De_Roo
Re: Moving forward Jonathan Borden
Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Moving forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: LANG: frame paradigm Dan Connolly
Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) Guus Schreiber
Moving forward Jonathan Borden
ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) Smith, Michael K
Re: LANG: frame paradigm Guus Schreiber
RE: ADMIN: regrets Stephen Buswell
Re: LANG: first sketch Enrico Motta
Re: ADMIN: regrets Libby Miller
ADMIN: regrets Said Tabet
Re: Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples Guus Schreiber
Re: owl:Ontology Jonathan Borden
LANG: Example ontology declaring XML Schema equivalence Jonathan Borden
LANG: owl:Ontology Jonathan Borden

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

Re: GUIDE: examples Frank van Harmelen
LANG: daml:collection and owl:seq, owl:set, owl:oneOf Jonathan Borden
Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples Evan Wallace
ADMIN: probable regrets Leo Obrst
Re: GUIDE: examples Deborah McGuinness
ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 14 Guus Schreiber
SEM: informal note on the layering landscape Peter F. Patel-Schneider
TEST categorize test suites Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

GUIDE: examples Guus Schreiber
XML datatypes Jonathan Borden
RE: LANG: first sketch Jim Hendler
USE CASES: science applications Jonathan Borden
AW: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language Raphael Volz

Sunday, 10 March 2002

Re: LANG: frame paradigm Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language Frank van Harmelen

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

LANG,GUIDE: Using XQuery types to specify XML valued datatype properties Jonathan Borden

Monday, 11 March 2002

Re: LANG: frame paradigm Frank van Harmelen
Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language Frank van Harmelen
TEST: sameGuy: it works with TRIPLE Stefan Decker

Saturday, 9 March 2002

Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use Ian Horrocks

Friday, 8 March 2002

Good news! Jeff Heflin
RE: LANG: first sketch & TEST abstract syntax Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 7 March 2002

Re: TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy) Ian Horrocks
Re: DAML query language Ian Horrocks
Re: LANG: first sketch Ian Horrocks
RE: LANG: first sketch Ian Horrocks
ADMIN: minutes for Mar 7 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST draft message Deborah McGuinness
Re: DAML query language Marwan Sabbouh
LANG: frame paradigm Ora Lassila
TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use Dan Connolly
TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy) Dan Connolly
http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/dql/ Deborah McGuinness
Re: DAML query language Deborah McGuinness
RE: LANG: first sketch Thompson, Lynne R
LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language Raphael Volz
RE: ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7 Thompson, Lynne R
Re: DAML query language Marwan Sabbouh
Re: LANG: first sketch Frank van Harmelen
RE: LANG: first sketch Dan Connolly
Re: DAML query language Libby Miller
DAML query language ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
Re: LANG: first sketch Frank van Harmelen
RE: LANG: first sketch Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty Jos De_Roo
Re: ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7 Evan Wallace
RE: LANG: first sketch Smith, Michael K
ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7 Guus Schreiber
WOWG: input for telecon on test cases Jeremy Carroll
an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty Dan Connolly
LANG: first sketch Frank van Harmelen
Re: ADMIN: current focus group primaries shimizu

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

ADMIN: current focus group primaries Jim Hendler
Re: SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Dan Connolly
requirements document publication in progress Dan Connolly
Re: ADMIN: Sign up please larry.eshelman@philips.com
WOWG: TEST: 2nd draft message Jos De_Roo
RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it) Smith, Michael K
Re: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST draft message Libby Miller
ADMIN: updates to 28 Feb minutes Frank van Harmelen
TEST draft message Jeremy Carroll
ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7 Guus Schreiber
RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jeremy Carroll
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jim Hendler
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
Re: Requirements document herman.ter.horst@philips.com
RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jeremy Carroll
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it) Jim Hendler
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jim Hendler
LANG: GEDCOM N3 as RDFxt Jonathan Borden

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

regrets for 3/7 Jonathan Borden
LANG: Strawman syntax was RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jonathan Borden
Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) Leo Obrst
RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Smith, Michael K
Re: SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Lynn Andrea Stein
LANG: Re: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jonathan Borden
RE: SEM: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jeremy Carroll
SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
RE: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jeremy Carroll
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
SEM: GUIDE: Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jim Hendler
SEM: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jim Hendler
Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. Dan Connolly
Re: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jonathan Borden
Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. Lynn Andrea Stein
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo
TEST: first deliverables Jeremy Carroll
RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jeremy Carroll
RE: Focus are summary Stephen Buswell
Requirements Document back online Raphael Volz

Monday, 4 March 2002

rdf:parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it Jonathan Borden

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. Dan Connolly
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
Re: Focus are summary Jonathan Borden
RE: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. Smith, Michael K
Focus are summary Jim Hendler

Monday, 4 March 2002

Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jonathan Borden
ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. Smith, Michael K
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo
Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) Jeff Heflin
Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Dan Connolly
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo
TEST, ANN: TRIPLE, and Re: ADMIN: Sign Up Please Michael Sintek
Re: subgroup telecons? Dan Connolly
Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) Evan Wallace
subgroup telecons? Jeremy Carroll
RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please Stephen Buswell
REQDOC: Title change? Jeff Heflin
RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please Said Tabet
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
AW: ADMIN: Sign Up Please Raphael Volz
LANG: language features larry.eshelman@philips.com
I would like to participate in language features Dieter Fensel
ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) Frank van Harmelen
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 3 March 2002

ADMIN: Sign Up Please Jim Hendler
Re: QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance? Libby Miller
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 2 March 2002

QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance? Leo Obrst
TEST: entailment test cases Jos De_Roo
Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 1 March 2002

JOKE: RE: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags Jim Hendler
Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Jim Hendler
more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Next steps (Action: all) Ora Lassila
RE: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags Jeremy Carroll
Re: Next steps (Action: all) Deborah McGuinness
TEST: RE: Next steps (Action: all) Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: first steps Mike Dean
Re: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags Peter F. Patel-Schneider
TEST: first steps Jeremy Carroll
WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags Jeremy Carroll
Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Jim Hendler
Re: Next steps (Action: all) Marwan Sabbouh
Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Next steps (Action: all) David Trastour
Apologies for 2002-03-07 telecon Nick Gibbins
Re: Next steps (Action: all) Frank van Harmelen

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 05:46:55 UTC