- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:26:39 -0600
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> After all, the primary syntax for RDF is (still) defined in XML. This is one of those things I seem to keep tripping over. I thought it was asserted that triples are "the" syntax for RDF because there were assertions that could be made using triples that could not be made using the XML syntax. And not just statements that amount to renaming of bnodes. If this is wrong, I stand corrected. - Mike
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 11:27:06 UTC