Re: WOWG: first language proposal

[...]

> Finally, an important issue will be finding a way to map your abstract
> syntax into XML/RDF and still preserve its simplicity. I believe that in
> order to get a good, intuitive syntax, we'll have to seriously consider
> dropping the idea of using triples to represent the language, i.e., do
> not layer on top of RDF Schema (but this is a point I've already raised
> in another thread).

I haven't seen anything in the past 3 years that would motivate
such an idea, really, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Overview.html

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/