- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:37:16 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-webont-wg <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jeremy, I saw at the rdfcore meeting in France how useful the RDF testcases were for clarifying your discussions. However I'm slightly puzzled as to how we can write testcases which will help us discuss the properties of a language whose model or syntax hasn't been decided yet. My impression was that the RDF testcases worked well because the rdfcore WG had both a syntax which closely described the RDF model and an XML syntax so that the testcases could be used to compare the two. I guess this is what the document you describe below will be about, but I wondered if you could say something about how you got to this stage in the RDF core group. cheers, Libby > > We propose that the test focus area should produce as their first > deliverable to the working group a document that describes one or more test > formats that will be useful for: > - dicussing the properties of OWL > - helping specify the properties of OWL > - testing implementations of OWL >
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 10:39:05 UTC