Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?


> What does it cost?
> 1) existing RDFS agents will not be able to understand your WebOnt
> ontologies (they can understand small portions of DAML+OIL ontologies.)
> 2) people may need to convert existing RDF Schemas in order to use
> WebOnt
> Honestly, that's all I can think of. Maybe someone else can suggest
> more?

we find it very useful to have that "least power thing"
and so to have stuff like "triple integrated circuits"
(can't imagine to loose that)

Jos De Roo

Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 18:40:09 UTC