- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:46:56 +0100
- To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I think we should consider the UML class model also as background reference. UML class (various books, incomplete listing of features) - subclass relation - disjointness, completeness (through constraints) - attributes (datatype properties) and relations (object properties) - cardinality constraints for attributes and relations - default values for attributes - class-scoped attributes (same for every member of class) - part-whole relations between classes (strong=composition, weak=agrregation) - abstract vs. concrete class, root and leaf class - tagging through stereotypes and tags Guus -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15 NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 20 525 6793 Fax: +31 20 525 6896; E-mail: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl WWW: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 11:47:38 UTC