Re: subgroup telecons?

On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:18, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> I am currently unclear whether the intent is for subgroups to have their own
> telecon's from time to time.

I think the term 'subgroup' has been used a few times, but it's
a misnomer. These are 'focus areas', not subgroups. Subgroups
involves subgroup chairs and all that; i.e. more work for
the team contact. I'd like to not go there just yet.

> Or is the idea to put the subgroup business that needs to be talked about in
> the main telecon?

I hope that will suffice.

> (e.g. I think agreeing the initial phase of the test group's work needs some
> phone time. Perhaps including partitioning the tasks).
> Jeremy
Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 12:47:39 UTC