- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:33:31 -0500 (EST)
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl> > Subject: Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:10:25 +0100 > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > > > A pointer to the literature should not be met with arguments, > > > even in jest, about ``intimidation''. > > > > > > Well, I guess it's my turn to apologise then. > > My remark was made purely in jest. > > Apologies if it offended anyone. > > > > Frank. > > ---- > > > > Thanks. I'm guitly of overreacting, and for that I apologize. Me too. I've made a couple of grouchy outbursts on this list recently, which should probably not have been sent. So anyway I'm taking a look at http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/OWL-first-proposal/motivation.html and just wanted to say that its very nice work :) One brief comment to be sent separately... Dan
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2002 09:33:31 UTC