RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
[Fwd: Please Review: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Working Draft]
Regrets for next two Thursdays
26 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Access Key
Partial Regrets (leaving early)
Agenda
WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
Re: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 26 August 2002
Regrets for Thursday
W3C Weekly News - 23 September 2002
Comment on WCAG 2.0: Scaling and stylizing text
[techs-scripts] + visibility
More Results
Validation
Fwd: Making Online Learning Accessible- Guidelines Released
19 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Re: 4.1 items list
regrets
Regrets
regrets
Checkpoint 5.3
Agenda
FW: Query about support for Hebrew
W3C Weekly News - 16 September 2002
Reduced Hebrew Vowel Set
4.1 reproposed
Hightlights of Thursdays Telecon with Device Independent Group
12 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG and DIWG Joint Teleconference Minutes
QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
Regrets for today (no note enclosed)
WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- Re: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
Reminder: joint meeting with device independence working group
W3C Weekly News - 10 September 2002
Checkpoints of WCAG 2.0 public working draft relevant to device independence
Regrets for Thursday...sorry!!!
05 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Fwd: UK Plain English Campaign
1.2: proposed rewording
Regrets
Partial regrets
RE: Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success c riterion #1
RE: Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success c riterion #1
Agenda
1.2: Example 2
5.4: proposal re level 2 success criteria
1.6 revisited
Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success crite rion #1
Fwd: RE: update on hebrew and arabic
Please review: device-independence and authoring scenarios documents
Technology-specific checklists
Regrets
W3C Weekly News - 2 September 2002
W3C Weekly News - 26 August 2002
summary
Dynamic Illustration!
A washingtonpost.com article from: aardit@voa.gov
FREE MORTGAGE QUOTES FREE MORTGAGE QUOTES FREE MORTGAGE QUOTES FREE MORTGAGE QUOTES27499
Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3
- Re: Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3
- Re: Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3
minutes from today's meeting
RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
Volunteer required to take minutes at this week's meeting
Agenda
Comments on WCAG 2.0
1.3 provision (was in 3.1)
REMOVAL OF ITEM 3.1 BECAUSE IT IS COVERED BY A 1.3 AND 4.1
New internal working draft available
background to last email
FW: Hebrew screen readers
RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion
Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
Nakdan
Moving Checkpoint 3.2 to Guideline 1 to Become New 1.4
Personal presentation
Unbelievable Mortgage Rates, These are LOW7912
Agenda
Regrets
regrets for 29 August meeting
22 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 - Deaf/Hard of Hearing Consumers
Agenda
fyi: new draft published
4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
RE: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
personal -presentation
Re: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion
Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
Checkpoint 9.3
W3C Weekly News - 20 August 2002
relative image size
IRC and teleconferences...
Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
minutes from Aug 15, 2002 teleconference
and more infor on Voewls
ADD THREE INCHES TO YOUR PENIS
[server side techs] graceful transition, sniffing, ...
Regrets - until after the 19th of August!!!
regrets
Agenda
Reach-Out CRM Distribution Opportunity
New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
Minutes from 1 August 2002 telecon (thanks Andi!)
W3C Weekly News - 12 August 2002
[HTML techs] FedStats Tables Workshop -- some key links
[techniques] DTD
A personal presentation...
08 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Regrets
August 7 Draft Available for Review
RE: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success cri teria
Agenda
crieria for Success criteria.
What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- RE: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- Re: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- For today
auto set focus and accessibility
- RE: auto set focus and accessibility
- Re: auto set focus and accessibility
- RE: auto set focus and accessibility
Accessible Art Online at Tage Gallery
W3C Weekly News - 5 August 2002
Fwd: Device Independence workshop + document
Level 2 assurance requirements: "the content has been reviewed..."
Request to Join the Web Content Guidelines Working Group
Request to Join
Request to Join
regrets, need minute taker for this week's call
Regrets
regrets
User Agent profiles (related to checkpoints 5.2 and 5.4)
Agenda
W3C Weekly News - 29 July 2002
Request to join
regrets
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
[Core Techniques] Quick review and ideas
Fwd: WWW2003 Budapest, Hungary - Call for Papers
Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
25 Jul 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Regrets
Regrets
Agenda
flash-navigation and sound-onmouseover
illustrating content - tables of figures
Hi All --- reminder - please post issues for the issue log or suggested wording or items
W3C Weekly News - 22 July 2002
Re: scripting and f2f
"Internet standards can no longer be written by technology firms alone" By line from Economist 20/7/02 pg 54
AUWG WCAG 2.0 Update Synopsis
4.1 Ideas Compilation
Minutes from 15/16 July WCAG WG F2F
No meeting planned this week
summary of ftf work on 4.1
ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
"Wide applicability" was Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
"Fewer than half the world"
FW: compatibility
Live picture from Linz
Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- RE: Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specifics to success criteria
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
Online Auction Announcement 23358
Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes