--
Carol Foster, Web Developer
Internet Publishing Group, Information Technology Services
University of Massachusetts, President's Office
phone: (413) 587-2130
fax: (413) 587-2148
mailto:c.foster@umassp.edu
http://www.umass-its.net/ipg
--
Forwarded message 1
I just read through the draft to get a feel for how hard it would be to change from
1.0, which we currently use as a standard for many of our sites. While I am in
great sympathy with all of the checkpoints and I wish everyone could do them all, I
do honestly think it would be difficult to migrate. I wish I had time to go
through it all thoroughly and give more detailed comments, and maybe I'll have time
to articulate more, but I do want to at least say that one thing that could make it
easier would be something along the lines of "If you currently meet WCAG 1.0, here
is what is needed to meet the minimum level of WCAG 2.0". Something like the
checkpoint mapping, but cut down to cover WCAG 2.0 minimum level only. That would
help me anyway!
Carol
> Judy Brewer wrote: [this is a short excerpt]
>
> 3. If your site or organization already uses WCAG 1.0, do you
> think it would be difficult to migrate from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0? What
> would make it easier? Please note that the Working Group is developing
> supporting documents, such as technology-specific techniques documents, for
> WCAG 2.0.
>
--
Carol Foster, Web Developer
Internet Publishing Group, Information Technology Services
University of Massachusetts, President's Office
phone: (413) 587-2130
fax: (413) 587-2148
mailto:c.foster@umassp.edu
http://www.umass-its.net/ipg
--