- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:11:22 -0400
- To: Doyle <dburnett@sesa.org>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The "Authoring Scenarios for Device Independence" is available at: http://www.w3.org/2001/di/public/as/as-draft-20020729.html In "Usage Scenarios for WCAG 2.0" [1] (a very rough initial draft that outlines some ideas), I link to specific sections of "Authoring Scenarios for Device Independence". For example, "Layout Designer, Stylistic Designer, Interaction Designer, Navigation Designer" [2] links to section 2.1 of "Authoring Scenarios for Device Independence." [3] The document, "How People with Disabilities Use the Web" is an important piece of the puzzle that is included in the list of "WCAG2.0-related documents." It does a good job of outlining how people with disabilities use the Web. Best, --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/09/authoring-scenarios.html [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/09/authoring-scenarios.html#Designer [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/di/public/as/as-draft-20020729.html#sec-designers At 12:47 PM 9/27/02, Doyle wrote: >To the group and Jason in particular, can you send me the link to the device >independent scenarios that you speak of. I did find some scenarios related >to device independence but in my reading they had everything to do with >people and their particular need in terms of accessibility and not role >specific (other than the person they are) - maybe I am confused. >(http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/Overview.html). Is this the >direction we are talking about (the above link)? > >I see web designer and policy maker roles at an organizational level as >being potentially all over the map. It would be (I feel) virtually >impossible for us either tell or know what it is that certain individuals >within some organizational structure ought to be doing. > >As I said, in yesterday's audio conference, I would give my first best shot >at writing up some scenarios as they relate to accessible design and >development features. When I look at what and how I wrote my first few >scenarios, they fall in-line with what I read from the link above. Am I on >the right track? The scenarios I read (if the correct ones) were nicely >done, easy to understand and something I think needs to be employed into our >work. > >Your input is desired. > >-- >Doyle Burnett >Education Specialist >Multiple Disabilities Program >907-562-7372 > > > > > From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> > > Reply-To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au > > Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:55:12 +1000 > > To: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > > Subject: RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios > > Resent-From: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > > Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:55:31 -0400 (EDT) > > > > > > In the device independence authoring scenarios document, on which > > Wendy wisely based the list of categories, these are discussed in > > terms of roles rather than people: what needs to be determined is the > > interplay between each of the roles and the technology, or, in our > > case, the documents. Obviously, some sites are implemented by only one > > person, who assumes, at different stages during the development > > process, each of the roles that Wendy identified. In other cases the > > roles will be distributed among different developers or groups > > thereof. Thus I think it is best to rework the document to make it > > clear that we are discussing the roles that implementors have in > > developing content, rather than trying to classify people by > > occupational category. > > > > -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:04:14 UTC