- From: john_slatin <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 17:41:29 -0500
- To: WCAG List <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6AC4E20EED49D411941400D0B77E52F0074B96E1@forum.cc.utexas.edu>
The note below restates material I sent to the list several months ago that has not been addressed in the current working draft-- perhaps because I didn't specifically propose new wording. I'm doing that here. John Current wording of Checkpoint 1.1, example 2: Example 2: Providing a short label and a longer explanation are provided for a data chart. A bar chart compares how many widgets were sold in June, July, and August. The short label says, "Graph of the numbers of widgets sold in June, July, and August." The longer explanation provides the data presented in the chart. Proposed wording: .... The longer description identifies the type of chart or graph, provides a high-level summary of the data comparable to that available from the chart or graph, and lists the data themselves. Comment: In my view, it's not sufficient for a LONGDESC simply to present the data in list form: the point of a bar chart, pie chart, etc., is precisely that it provides a symbolic representation of the numerical data to assist understanding, and I believe a LONGDESC should attempt to render that information as well as the data themselves. John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Technology & Learning University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C, Mail code G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu <mailto:jslatin@mail.utexas.edu> web http://www.ital.utexas.edu <http://www.ital.utexas.edu>
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 18:41:30 UTC