- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 01:04:52 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <005401c23dd8$59740080$066fa8c0@laptop600>
Hi All, At the last GL Teleconference call we discussed the levels of conformance and how to determine what goes in which. I promised to take a crack at capturing what has been discussed and done in this regard. Here is what it looks like so far 1. We decided that success criteria had to all be things that were testable. This could either be A) machine testing or B) Human testing with a high inter-rater reliability (HIRR). (i.e. most raters who understand issue and/or measure would all say the same thing.) 2. We also decided that Levels 1 and 2 would have to be things that applied to all (types of) sites. * This is especially important for Level 1 - since no type of conformance could be claimed if without all level one items. And if we made it so that some sites could not reasonably meet a level 1, we would be making it so that some sites could make not claims of accessibility. These are posted to the list for discussion as consensus items
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2002 02:05:01 UTC