- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:12:20 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- cc: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The wording below is so vague as to support Jason's first argument that the succcess criterion be removed. In fact, I suggest that while it is fine advice, it is not clear to me why any 3 people would do the same thing in arriving at a decision, let alone the 8 or 9 out of 10 that is our test for "testability" Chaals On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Jason White wrote: >If checkpoint 5.4 is retained, I suggest that the level 2 success >criteria be rewritten to correspond to the review requirements >elsewhere in the guidelines, viz.: >The content has been reviewed and is believed to be compatible with a >range of assistive technologies.
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 03:12:23 UTC