- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:19:50 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 27 June, I met with several people from the WWAAC. http://212.187.34.208/wwaac/ Doeko Hekstra - Handicom Mike Clarke, Andrew Lysley, Mark Saville, David Colven - ACE Centre Advisory Trust Colette Nicolle - Loughborough University Bengt Farre - Femtio Procent Data I took an action to outline issues and follow-up with several W3C folks. My outline is at: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/03-symbolAnnotation.html Here is a brief trip report: They gave me an update of the WWAAC progress (http://www.wwaac.org/), a demonstration of the browser they are developing, and discussed a mock-up of future directions for development. We talked quite a lot about using images to annotate content. I took an action to write-up my ideas and discuss with the Annotea folk. As well as put the WWAAC and Annotea folk in touch w/each other. As part of their project, they are supposed to write guidelines for developing an AAC-enabled WWW. They will be sending at least one person to the WCAG F2F in Linz 15/16 July. It seems that we are moving towards a general guideline about writing simply and plainly, but have techniques for folks who want to create content specific for people with cognitive disabilities. We will have a group of people at the Linz meeting to discuss this. We're planning to approach it from the techniques perspective at the meeting. Others who are registered to attend to participate in this topic discussion: Avi Arditti (Voice of America and Plain English Network) Jonathan Chetwynd + Bengt from WWAAC. They want to standardize concept codes as a way to easily translate between symbol languages. e.g. bliss has one symbol for cat, but another symbol language uses a different symbol. We discussed using WordNet as a catalog of concept codes, but we need to look into how English-specific it is. We discussed the possibility of creating a symbol-based style sheet for an XML file as well as content negotiation for symbols. They gave me an install of "Symbol for Windows" to demonstrate the issues and solutions. They were well prepared and circulated a couple of documents in preparation for the meeting. 1. Guidelines for Developing an AAC-Enable WWW (a discussion document) 2. WWAAC Code of Practice (in 2 parts) - Exchanging information over the Internet through Concept Coding - Improving accessibility of web-based information and services for persons with limited cognitive, language, and/or motor skills The first, went through WCAG 2.0 and raised good research questions as possible future directions for their group. They were trying to make sense of how they could contribute. I think we found many connection points - primarily in review and documentation of techniques. The second, described an XML syntax to markup concept codes. -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 12:09:49 UTC