Friday, 31 August 2012
- Support for ECB
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Closing ISSUE-16
- Re: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- New Editor's Draft Published
- Re: (Minor) New version published
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-31: Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-35 closed
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-35 closed
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-35 closed
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-20 closed
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-18 closed
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-9 closed
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-6 closed
- Web Crypto WG - ACTION-14 associated with ISSUE-37
- W3C Web Crypto WG - ACTION-15 closed
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - draft API v 1.25 has been published
- W3C Web Crypto WG - draft API v 1.25 has been published
- Note on process re closing ISSUES
Thursday, 30 August 2012
- crypto-ISSUE-38: Key initialization and "finalization" [Web Cryptography API]
- Closing ISSUE-16
- CLOSING ISSUE-20
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - Comments on Draft API v22
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
- Re: Proposed text to close ISSUE-13
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Proposed text to close ISSUE-13
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Proposed text to close ISSUE-13
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Proposed text to close ISSUE-13
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Key Generation via CMP (Certificate Management Protocol)
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-40 : clarifying smart card usage in section 4 of the draft API
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-40 : clarifying smart card usage in section 4 of the draft API
- Key Generation via CMP (Certificate Management Protocol)
- W3C Web Crypto WG - our next call is on 4th of Sept @ 19:00 UTC and will deal with FPWD
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-40 : clarifying smart card usage in section 4 of the draft API
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-32 (Key security): Section 5.2 in API draft should mention use of secure element in the context of key security [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-32 (Key security): Section 5.2 in API draft should mention use of secure element in the context of key security [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-40 : clarifying smart card usage in section 4 of the draft API
- RE: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- RE: (Minor) New version published
- Re: Editorial comments on Web Crypto API
- Re: (Minor) New version published
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: (Minor) New version published
- crypto-ISSUE-36 (derivation): Semantics for key generation versus key derivation [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-35 (wrapping): Handling of wrap/unwrap operations [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- ISSUE-8: Clean key neutering (was Re: New Editor's Draft)
- RE: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- crypto-ISSUE-34 (certificate-format): Representation of certificates [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - Comments on Draft API v22
- crypto-ISSUE-33 (Clarify key tainting): Clarify text in section 5.1 with respect to how key tainting is handled with multi-origin scenario [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-32 (Key security): Section 5.2 in API draft should mention use of secure element in the context of key security [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-31: Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-31: Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface [Web Cryptography API]
Monday, 27 August 2012
- Re: Recognized algorithm names for SHA-2 algorithms
- crypto-ISSUE-31: Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ACTION-38: pre-shared keys
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - Comments on Draft API v21
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Web Crypto WG - status on pending ISSUE-3 related to algo discovery ?
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- Web Crypto WG - status on pending ISSUE-3 related to algo discovery ?
- Web Crypto WG - ISSUE-4 : algorithm Must versus Should - CLOSED
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ACTION-38: pre-shared keys
- crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- ACTION-38: pre-shared keys
- [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-40 : clarifying smart card usage in section 4 of the draft API
- [Web Crypto WG] ACTION-39 : adding sample code in the draft API
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] - Comments on Draft API v22
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- ACTION-36: key exchange with DH
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Draft meeting minutes for August 27th
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- Re: Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- Explanation of deriveKey (was Re: ACTION-22: Key export)
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Editorial comments on Web Crypto API
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] - Comments on Draft API v21
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 27th of august call - today
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited [and latest API draft comments]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: (Minor) New version published
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
Sunday, 26 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: suggest to move weekly concall time from UTC 19:00 to different time.
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: suggest to move weekly concall time from UTC 19:00 to different time.
- suggest to move weekly concall time from UTC 19:00 to different time.
Saturday, 25 August 2012
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
Friday, 24 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
Thursday, 23 August 2012
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
Wednesday, 22 August 2012
Thursday, 23 August 2012
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- W3C Web Crypto WG - call for WG participants to review the draft API before FPWD
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
Wednesday, 22 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-28: Short-names for algorithms [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-29 (block modes): Handling of block encryption modes and padding [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-28: Short-names for algorithms [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- (Minor) New version published
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- ISSUE-26 (was Re: origin bound key generation)
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-28: Short-names for algorithms [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: origin bound key generation
- crypto-ISSUE-26 (multi-origin access): Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: origin bound key generation
- Re: origin bound key generation
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] functional features list in draft API and issue tracker
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: Recognized algorithm names for SHA-2 algorithms
- Recognized algorithm names for SHA-2 algorithms
- Re: origin bound key generation
- Re: New Editor's Draft published
- Re: origin bound key generation
- Re: origin bound key generation
- Re: origin bound key generation
- Re: origin bound key generation
- origin bound key generation
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] functional features list in draft API and issue tracker
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] functional features list in draft API and issue tracker
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] next call on 4th of september ? please vote
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Take away from 20th of august call
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] Take away from 20th of august call
- crypto-ISSUE-25 (Global Unique ID): How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisionned symetric keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Support for generic authentication tokens
Monday, 20 August 2012
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] draft minutes of our call - 20th of august
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft published
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: New Editor's Draft published
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft published
- crypto-ISSUE-24: Defining a Synchronous API [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-23: Should CryptoOperations and/or Keys support Transferrable semantics?
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- New Editor's Draft published
- Re: ACTION-23: Find out status of getrandom in HTML5
- crypto-ISSUE-23: Should CryptoOperations and/or Keys support Transferrable semantics?
- crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
- ACTION-23: Find out status of getrandom in HTML5
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] comments on draft API - section 4
- Please attempt to close ACTIONs before the next meeting
Friday, 17 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Support for generic authentication tokens
- W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 20th of august call
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- RE: Use Case: Cryptographic primitives can help check source integrity before executing Javascript code previously stored in local storage.
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] preparing the FPWD - collecting comments
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] preparing the FPWD - collecting comments
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] preparing the FPWD - collecting comments
Thursday, 16 August 2012
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- RE: ACTION-22: Key export
- RE: RE: JOSE WG request from W3C WebCrypto API
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: RE: JOSE WG request from W3C WebCrypto API
- RE: RE: JOSE WG request from W3C WebCrypto API
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: Origin-bound keys
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- RE: ACTION-22: Key export
- RE: ACTION-22: Key export
- RE: Origin-bound keys
- RE: Support for generic authentication tokens
- RE: New Editor's Draft
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-18: Should it be possible to perform CryptoOperations as a 'streaming' operation with URI semantics? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] how to scribe and other tips
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- Re: Origin-bound keys
Monday, 13 August 2012
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: ACTION-22: Key export
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] action and issue update
- crypto-ISSUE-20 (key and attribute storage): What are the requirements and the possible technical solution(s) to control the storage of key and associated attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: JOSE WG request
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] action-16 related to key query mechanism
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] draft minutes of 13th of August call
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] how to scribe and other tips
- regrets
- Process for going to FPWD: Review the spec!
- Re: Agenda for Monday Aug 13th meeting (today!)
- RE: Agenda for Monday Aug 13th meeting (today!)
- Agenda for Monday Aug 13th meeting (today!)
- Fwd: RE: JOSE WG request from W3C WebCrypto API
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- ACTION-22: Key export
- crypto-ISSUE-19 (origin-bound key): Does it make sense to have authorized-origin and specific-origin keys [Web Cryptography API]
Saturday, 11 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-4: Some proposed text for the spec to close the issue
- Re: Support for generic authentication tokens
- Re: Support for generic authentication tokens
- Support for generic authentication tokens
Friday, 10 August 2012
Thursday, 9 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: New Editor's Draft
- Re: New Editor's Draft
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: Draft minutes from today's Web Crypto Telecon
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
Monday, 6 August 2012
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
Monday, 6 August 2012
- Draft minutes from today's Web Crypto Telecon
- JOSE WG request
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- crypto-ISSUE-4: Some proposed text for the spec to close the issue
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-18: Should it be possible to perform CryptoOperations as a 'streaming' operation with URI semantics? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- crypto-ISSUE-18: Should it be possible to perform CryptoOperations as a 'streaming' operation with URI semantics? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Re: Origin-bound keys
- Origin-bound keys
- Re: Regrets
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] agenda of 6th of August @ 19:00 UTC
- Regrets
- New Editor's Draft
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-17: Define the scope and API for custom key attributes [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-16: Definition for Key Expiration [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-15: Discovering certificates associated with (private) keys [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-15: Discovering certificates associated with (private) keys [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-14: Representation of raw key material [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-13: Relationship between the W3C Web Cryptography work product and the IETF JOSE WG [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-12: Should the API distinguish between algorithm and operation parameters? [Web Cryptography API]
Friday, 3 August 2012
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] ACTION-29 : a possible test framework
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] ACTION-29 : a possible test framework
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-11 (storage attribute): Is there a need for a storage attribute, indicating storage in a hardware token
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] ACTION-29 : a possible test framework
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-11 (storage attribute): Is there a need for a storage attribute, indicating storage in a hardware token
- crypto-ISSUE-11 (storage attribute): Is there a need for a storage attribute, indicating storage in a hardware token
- JavaScript-only test suite project - action-29
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] ACTION-29 : a possible test framework
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-8 (key neutering): Making sure we describe the clean key neutering [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-10 (pure js environment): Making sure our API is usable with pure js environement
- crypto-ISSUE-9 (user consent): what will be the mean to integrate in the API the fact that key usage may need user consent ? [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-8 (key neutering): Making sure we describe the clean key neutering [Web Cryptography API]
- crypto-ISSUE-7 (high level API): Deciding if we integrate a high level API in our deliverable [Web Cryptography API]