----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Sleevi" <sleevi@google.com> > To: "Web Cryptography Working Group" <public-webcrypto@w3.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 9:35:09 AM > Subject: Re: crypto-ISSUE-22: Should CryptoOperations be clonable [Web Cryptography API] > I'm not really sure it makes sense for CryptoOperation to be > clonable. +1 > The use cases for it are not really clear to me (hence #2 there), so > it would be good to understand. > > I would expect that this would be an area for implementations to tune > accordingly, much like they do other potentially intensive uses of > resources (eg: WebGL), where they can re-use or share contexts > between > multiple distinct operations, as long as their states have > transitioned accordingly. > I worry about the complexity of the implementation and the memory management issues this will bring up. Cheers, DavidReceived on Monday, 20 August 2012 16:34:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:01:25 UTC