- From: Web Cryptography Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:20:37 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
crypto-ISSUE-23: Should CryptoOperations and/or Keys support Transferrable semantics? http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/issues/23 Raised by: Ryan Sleevi On product: Transferrable allows an object to be passed over a MessagePort, which allows it to be used with Web Workers. During initial discussions, it was suggested that CryptoOperations or Keys should have defined Transferrable semantics. The outstanding questions are: 1) Is there consensus to support Transferrable semantics? 2) If so, what are the use cases for Transferrables? 3) Because CryptoOperations represent objects with bound callbacks, what should the behaviour be for these Callbacks? 4) What happens if an object is Transferred in the midst of an operation? 5) If Key participates in the "structured clone algorithm", does it also need to be Transferrable?
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 14:20:38 UTC