On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > I've emailed Adrian and cc'ed Vijay, hopefully an answer is forthcoming > shortly! Will tell mailing list if we need to add that function > (window.crypto.**getRandomValues) in explicitly to our Editor's draft, > but no reason to hold up FPWD over it [1]. > > cheers, > harry > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2012/**webcrypto/track/actions/35<https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/35> > > Hi Harry, It wasn't clear to me from our telecon notes what the ACTION was here, but I will note that getRandomValues is currently listed as part of our draft, so whether or not IE has or hasn't implemented it, it would seem like having it in our draft isn't problematic. Have I misunderstood the motivation for this?Received on Friday, 31 August 2012 17:45:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:01:26 UTC