public-sdw-wg@w3.org from September 2016 by date

Friday, 30 September 2016

• Re: [ssn] Generic Sensor API - SOSA Core alignment Joshua Lieberman
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Andrea Perego
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Ed Parsons
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Clemens Portele
• [ssn] Generic Sensor API - SOSA Core alignment Armin Haller

Thursday, 29 September 2016

• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Andrea Perego
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Andrea Perego
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• RE: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Linda van den Brink
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Andrea Perego
• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard Scott Simmons
• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard Joshua Lieberman
• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard Scott Simmons

Wednesday, 28 September 2016

• Re: Some errors in the discussion of SSN Phil Archer
• Re: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Joshua Lieberman
• Re: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Some errors in the discussion of SSN Kerry Taylor
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Andrea Perego
• regrets for 2 weeks Scott Simmons
• RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Kerry Taylor
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Clemens Portele
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Andrea Perego
• [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard Kerry Taylor
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Clemens Portele
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Ed Parsons
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 Andrea Perego
• SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Linda van den Brink
• Re: [w3c/sdw] SSN / SOSA / Activity Hierarchy (#309) Raphaël Troncy
• RE: Joint session on vocabulary with Web of Things Kerry Taylor

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

• SDW SSN meeting Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• SDW SSN meeting Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Fragment identifiers in SDWWG deliverables Rob Atkinson
• Re: Fragment identifiers in SDWWG deliverables Andrea Perego
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Andrea Perego
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Andrea Perego
• RE: [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward Little, Chris
• RE: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Svensson, Lars
• Re: Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number Rob Atkinson
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Rob Atkinson
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Frans Knibbe
• Re: Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number Dmitry Brizhinev
• Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number Frans Knibbe
• no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release Jeremy Tandy
• [sdw] namespaces https or http? Kerry Taylor

Monday, 26 September 2016

• Re: [sdw] ssn meeting this week Rob Atkinson
• Re: coverage call this week? Rob Atkinson
• Re: New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples Frans Knibbe
• Re: New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Frans Knibbe
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo Kerry Taylor
• coverage call this week? Bill Roberts
• Re: [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward Bill Roberts
• [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward Kerry Taylor
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Frans Knibbe
• [sdw] ssn meeting this week Kerry Taylor
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Frans Knibbe
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Frans Knibbe
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Andrea Perego
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Andrea Perego
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Frans Knibbe
• Geonovum testbed reports Linda van den Brink
• RE: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Sunday, 25 September 2016

• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation Ghislain Atemezing

Friday, 23 September 2016

• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation Rob Atkinson
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: Rob's approach Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Requirement for topological data? Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo Rob Atkinson
• Re: The real size of Africa Krzysztof Janowicz
• Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Frans Knibbe
• Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirement for topological data? Rob Atkinson
• Fwd: Requirement for topological data? Frans Knibbe
• Re: The real size of Africa Frans Knibbe

Thursday, 22 September 2016

• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Andreas Harth
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: Content negotiation of spatial linked data Svensson, Lars
• Re: Some errors in the discussion of SSN Maxime Lefrançois
• Some errors in the discussion of SSN Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Wednesday, 21 September 2016

• [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-20 Phil Archer

Tuesday, 20 September 2016

• [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-19 Phil Archer

Monday, 19 September 2016

• Re: Lisbon timings Bill Roberts
• Lisbon timings Rob Atkinson

Sunday, 18 September 2016

• Re: Best Practice preparation for TPAC Bart van Leeuwen

Friday, 16 September 2016

• Re: New member: short introduction Ed Parsons
• Re: New member: short introduction Maxime LEFRANCOIS

Thursday, 15 September 2016

• Re: QB4ST example Rob Atkinson
• Re: The real size of Africa Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: The real size of Africa Byron Cochrane
• RE: The real size of Africa Byron Cochrane
• RE: QB4ST example Little, Chris
• Re: QB4ST example Bill Roberts
• Re: QB4ST example Rob Atkinson
• Re: The real size of Africa Ed Parsons
• Re: The real size of Africa Frans Knibbe
• The real size of Africa Linda van den Brink
• Re: QB4ST example Dmitry Brizhinev
• Re: QB4ST example Dmitry Brizhinev
• New member: short introduction Maxime LEFRANCOIS
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• QB4ST example Rob Atkinson

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

• Re: updates to the Best Practice document [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Best Practice preparation for TPAC Linda van den Brink
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? Jon Blower
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Frans Knibbe
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jon Blower
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? Frans Knibbe
• My comments on the Best Practice document Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Ed Parsons

Tuesday, 13 September 2016

• RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Byron Cochrane
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? Jon Blower
• Re: New participant to the WG Ed Parsons
• New participant to the WG Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Rob Atkinson
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting.. Scott Simmons
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting.. Ed Parsons
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Ed Parsons
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Rob Atkinson

Monday, 12 September 2016

• RE: updates to the Best Practice document Byron Cochrane
• RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Byron Cochrane
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Rob Atkinson
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Frans Knibbe
• Use Cases and Requirements: current status & preparation for TPAC Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Joshua Lieberman
• Re: New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples Frans Knibbe
• Re: New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Rob Atkinson
• Re: fixing ssn Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: fixing ssn Kerry Taylor

Sunday, 11 September 2016

• Re: fixing ssn Krzysztof Janowicz
• fixing ssn Kerry Taylor

Friday, 9 September 2016

• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jon Blower
• UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Ed Parsons
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirement in scope? Frans Knibbe
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement Frans Knibbe
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jon Blower
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Frans Knibbe

Thursday, 8 September 2016

• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jeremy Tandy
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jeremy Tandy
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document Jeremy Tandy
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Wednesday, 7 September 2016

• updates to the Best Practice document Jeremy Tandy

Tuesday, 6 September 2016

• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Rob Atkinson
• RE: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Byron Cochrane
• Re: SSN/SOSA/O&M: is an observation an event, activity, or information object? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: ssn meeting this week Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: sdw coverage meeting this week Jon Blower
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Jeremy Tandy

Monday, 5 September 2016

• RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Byron Cochrane
• RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Rob Atkinson
• RE: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Byron Cochrane
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• agenda for BP call this week; 14:00 UTC on Wed 7-Sep Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP restructuring: Metadata section Andrea Perego
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Raphaël Troncy
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• Re: ssn meeting this week s.kolozali@surrey.ac.uk
• Re: ssn meeting this week Scott Simmons
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Rob Atkinson
• sdw coverage meeting this week Kerry Taylor
• ssn meeting this week Kerry Taylor
• Apologies for absence this week and next Phil Archer
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Andrea Perego
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Andrea Perego
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Sunday, 4 September 2016

• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Rob Atkinson
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman

Friday, 2 September 2016

• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirement in scope? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Frans Knibbe
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Jon Blower
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" Scott Simmons
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Jon Blower
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Frans Knibbe
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Frans Knibbe
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" Rob Atkinson
• New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation Frans Knibbe
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Frans Knibbe
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Thursday, 1 September 2016

• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Rob Atkinson
• Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Byron Cochrane
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Rob Atkinson
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Rob Atkinson
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Dan Brickley
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Byron Cochrane
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Byron Cochrane
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Joshua Lieberman
• New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples Frans Knibbe
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Frans Knibbe
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Joshua Lieberman
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement Rob Atkinson
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision Jeremy Tandy
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? Jon Blower
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jon Blower
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement Frans Knibbe
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Little, Chris
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Ed Parsons
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Byron Cochrane
• Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" Frans Knibbe
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" Jeremy Tandy

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 13:45:13 UTC