Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo

Dear Kerry,


> If you can come to the meeting (as just called, *27 September 2016 21:00
> UTC
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20160927T21&ah=1&msg=SSN%20Call>)
> *then we can certainly include that within the topics already on the
> agenda. I hope you can make it. If not, we can put it on the next agenda.
>
I'm very unsure I can make it, better postpone my participation to next
meeting.


> Btw – I think maybe what we already have here: https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/
> is already as you describe – and see also https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/dul/
> . Very happy to get some attention to this topic!
>
Not fully.. I will try to use this example as a comparison point, it will
ease my demonstration.

Kind regards,
Maxime


>
>
> -Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Maxime Lefrançois [mailto:maxime.lefrancois.86@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, 24 September 2016 2:04 AM
> *To:* Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>; SDW WG Public List <
> public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files:
> demo
>
>
>
> Dear Armin, all,
>
>
>
> This mail is to confirm that I would be glad to show a demo about how one
> may expose modularized ontologies all having the same slash-based
> namespace, along with alignments to other ontologies.
>
>
>
> This could be during one of the next telecon, I believe it would be around
> October 4th.
>
>
>
> Following this demo, I believe it would be good to discuss about which
> should be the URIs of each module, and which of the modules should be given
> the namespace URI (and hence be the "default" one, available at the
> namespace URI).
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Maxime Lefrançois
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>