W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016

From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 09:27:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHrFjc=tveSso44xXZ0jC+iByrCOD5kjG0JF0vECwDt9VXnG9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Cc: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>, Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Thanks Guys,

Looks Good, how would you like the feedback collected ? Should we just take
notes or would you like something more structured ?

Clemens, I'm happy to MC the session if you want to collect the feedback ?

Ed


On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 09:58 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
wrote:

> Dear Ed, all,
>
> As agreed in Lisbon, we drafted a programme for the SDW Workshop at the
> INSPIRE 2016 conference, which is now available on the WG wiki:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Background_.26_purpose_of_workshop
>
> Because of time constraints (1.5h), the idea is to focus the discussion
> on the BP deliverable, in particular on those BPs we see as most
> relevant to the audience (these are listed in the wiki page).
>
> We think it would be relevant to get feedback both from the people
> already doing "spatial data on the Web" (do the BPs provide a good
> enough coverage of the issues they had to face and the solutions they
> adopted?), and those who plan to do them (do the BPs provide clear
> enough guidance on how to do that?)
>
> The idea is also to explain that we're trying to "crack open" their
> datasets, so that each individual "data item" (spatial thing) is
> addressable in the Web's information space.
>
> Do you think this make sense?
>
> The wiki page includes also a tentative agenda. Probably, to get
> feedback in a more effective way, it would good to have break out
> sessions on the selected BPs, but I don't know if this is feasible, and
> it probably depends on how many people will join the workshop. When we
> had the SDW workshop at INSPIRE 2014 in Aalborg, we had around 150
> people attending, and this year we have around 1,000 participants at the
> INSPIRE conference (more than in 2014). However, since the workshop is
> on Friday, we may have a smaller audience.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Linda, Jeremy and Andrea
>
>
>
> On 05/08/2016 15:07, Andrea Perego wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > This is to let you know that the SDW workshop proposal for INSPIRE 2016
> > has been accepted, and it is scheduled on Friday, Sep, 30th, at 9AM:
> >
> > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/wsl
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> > On 10/06/2016 15:58, Andrea Perego wrote:
> >> Thanks, Clemens.
> >>
> >> This being the situation, probably we should consider having an oral
> >> presentation, in case it won't be actually possible to run a workshop.
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, I submitted a draft proposal. I include below the relevant
> >> parts for you to review. Please change it as you see fit.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Andrea
> >>
> >> ----
> >>
> >> WORKSHOP PROPOSAL
> >>
> >> TITLE: W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group
> >>
> >> ABSTRACT:
> >>
> >> The Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (SDW WG) is a joint initiative
> >> of the
> >> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> >> aiming
> >> to bridge the geospatial technologies and the Web, thus facilitating the
> >> publication and use of spatial data across platforms and communities.
> >>
> >> In order to achieve this, the SDW WG is working on a set of
> >> deliverables, described in the WG Charter
> >> (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter), covering best practices for
> >> the publication of spatial data on the Web, based on identified use
> >> cases and requirements, plus the standardisation of a set of ontologies
> >> (Time Ontology, Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary, Coverages in
> >> Linked Data).
> >>
> >> The workshop is meant to illustrate the work done so far, by providing
> >> an overview of the current version of the deliverables, and to collect
> >> feedback from participants on the proposed solutions and open issues.
> >>
> >> AGENDA:
> >>
> >> - Introduction & purpose of the workshop
> >> - Background and objectives of the SDW WG
> >> - Overview of SDW WG deliverables
> >> - Breakout sessions
> >> - Summary from breakout sessions & conclusions
> >>
> >> ----
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/06/2016 19:09, Clemens Portele wrote:
> >>> Andrea,
> >>>
> >>> while I will likely be in Barcelona on Tuesday and Friday morning, do
> >>> not make the planning dependent on me. There are other submissions that
> >>> I am involved in and I expect to be already quite busy during the week.
> >>> If I do not have a session conflict I will attend the workshop and
> >>> contribute to the discussion as good as possible, but right now I
> cannot
> >>> commit to a more active role.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Clemens
> >>>
> >>> On 9 June 2016 at 15:24:41, Andrea Perego
> >>> (andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu
> >)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jon, Clemens, Ed,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your mails!
> >>>>
> >>>> So, the preference for the workshop would be:
> >>>> - 1st choice: Friday (morning?), 1.5 hours
> >>>> - 2nd choice: Tuesday morning, 1.5 hours
> >>>>
> >>>> @Jon, @Clemens, would both dates suit you well?
> >>>>
> >>>> About the agenda, I wonder what you think should be included.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just trying a possible outline:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Introduction to SDW WG & purpose of the workshop
> >>>> - Overview of deliverables
> >>>> - Breakout sessions on selected topics from BP / UCR & SDW ontologies
> >>>> - Summary of breakout sessions & conclusions
> >>>>
> >>>> Covering all the deliverables in 1.5 hours is probably too much, but
> >>>> the
> >>>> agenda & the discussion topics could be refined based on the
> >>>> outcomes of
> >>>> the f2f at the TPAC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does this make sense to you?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrea
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09/06/2016 10:17, Ed Parsons wrote:
> >>>> > HI Andrea,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I can be there with a probability of 1.0 on the 30th, 0.7 on the
> >>>> 27th,
> >>>> > 0.1 on the 26th !
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Ed
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 21:57 Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk
> >>>> > <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I will probably be there (75% confidence level), but not all week.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Cheers,
> >>>> > Jon
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > On 8 Jun 2016, at 20:50, Andrea Perego
> >>>> > <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu
> >>>> > <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Dear all,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > During today's call [1], we briefly discussed the option of
> >>>> > submitting a workshop proposal to INSPIRE 2016, considering also
> >>>> > that this would be an opportunity to get feedback on the new
> >>>> > versions of the deliverables.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > May I ask you who from the WG plans to be at the INSPIRE
> >>>> > conference? According to the draft programme [2], time slots for the
> >>>> > workshops are 1.5 hour, and are scheduled on Monday (26th), Tuesday
> >>>> > morning (27th), and Friday (30th).
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > NB: I kindly ask you to let me know ASAP, since the deadline for
> >>>> > submission if this Friday.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Thanks!
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Andrea
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > ----
> >>>> > > [1]https://www.w3.org/2016/06/08-sdw-minutes#item04
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> [2]
> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/ovw
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >> On 08/06/2016 10:37, Andrea Perego wrote:
> >>>> > >> Thanks, Kerry.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> I would like to add another item to the agenda, following up from
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-sdw-minutes#item02
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> As you know, the INSPIRE conference this year will be in
> >>>> Barcelona,
> >>>> > >> right after the W3C TPAC:
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> We (JRC) think it would be good to present the work done by the
> >>>> > SDW WG,
> >>>> > >> and collect feedback.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> So, I wonder whether we can devote 5 minutes to discuss the
> >>>> > possibility
> >>>> > >> of proposing a workshop during today's call.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> The deadline for submission is quite close (June, 10th), but we
> >>>> just
> >>>> > >> need a short abstract (max 400 words) and filling in a template
> >>>> [1].
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Thanks in advance
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Andrea
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> ----
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> [1]
> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/Workshop_template_2016.doc
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >>> On 07/06/2016 14:20, Kerry Taylor wrote:
> >>>> > >>> G’day,
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> The full SDW meeting this week will be held at the usual time
> >>>> > and place:
> >>>> > >>> *8 June 2016 13:00 GMT
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> <
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SDWWG+Call&iso=20160608T13&p1=1440&ah=1
> >*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> Agenda:
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> 1. ISSUE-18 model reuse
> >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and ISSUE-19
> >>>> > >>> Multiple types of coverage
> >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19> and Related
> >>>> > >>> actions (ACTION-114 and ACTION-115)
> >>>> > >>> 2. ISSUE-32 Independence of reference systems
> >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32>
> >>>> > >>> 3. F2F meeting plan
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon>
> >>>> > >>> 4. UCR completion
> >>>> > >>> 5. Spatial ontology: next steps
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> More details and dial-in instructions:
> >>>> > >>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160608
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> --Kerry & Ed
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > --
> >>>> > > Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> >>>> > > Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> >>>> > > European Commission DG JRC
> >>>> > > Institute for Environment & Sustainability
> >>>> > > Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
> >>>> > > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> >>>> > > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> >>>> > Geospatial Technologist, Google
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <020%207881%204501>
> >>>> > www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com> @edparsons
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> >>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> >>>> European Commission DG JRC
> >>>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability
> >>>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
> >>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> >>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> >>>>
> >>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>
-- 

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 09:28:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:26 UTC