- From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 09:27:21 +0000
- To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>, Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Message-ID: <CAHrFjc=tveSso44xXZ0jC+iByrCOD5kjG0JF0vECwDt9VXnG9w@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Guys, Looks Good, how would you like the feedback collected ? Should we just take notes or would you like something more structured ? Clemens, I'm happy to MC the session if you want to collect the feedback ? Ed On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 09:58 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> wrote: > Dear Ed, all, > > As agreed in Lisbon, we drafted a programme for the SDW Workshop at the > INSPIRE 2016 conference, which is now available on the WG wiki: > > > https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Background_.26_purpose_of_workshop > > Because of time constraints (1.5h), the idea is to focus the discussion > on the BP deliverable, in particular on those BPs we see as most > relevant to the audience (these are listed in the wiki page). > > We think it would be relevant to get feedback both from the people > already doing "spatial data on the Web" (do the BPs provide a good > enough coverage of the issues they had to face and the solutions they > adopted?), and those who plan to do them (do the BPs provide clear > enough guidance on how to do that?) > > The idea is also to explain that we're trying to "crack open" their > datasets, so that each individual "data item" (spatial thing) is > addressable in the Web's information space. > > Do you think this make sense? > > The wiki page includes also a tentative agenda. Probably, to get > feedback in a more effective way, it would good to have break out > sessions on the selected BPs, but I don't know if this is feasible, and > it probably depends on how many people will join the workshop. When we > had the SDW workshop at INSPIRE 2014 in Aalborg, we had around 150 > people attending, and this year we have around 1,000 participants at the > INSPIRE conference (more than in 2014). However, since the workshop is > on Friday, we may have a smaller audience. > > Thanks! > > Linda, Jeremy and Andrea > > > > On 05/08/2016 15:07, Andrea Perego wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > This is to let you know that the SDW workshop proposal for INSPIRE 2016 > > has been accepted, and it is scheduled on Friday, Sep, 30th, at 9AM: > > > > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/wsl > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andrea > > > > On 10/06/2016 15:58, Andrea Perego wrote: > >> Thanks, Clemens. > >> > >> This being the situation, probably we should consider having an oral > >> presentation, in case it won't be actually possible to run a workshop. > >> > >> Meanwhile, I submitted a draft proposal. I include below the relevant > >> parts for you to review. Please change it as you see fit. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Andrea > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> WORKSHOP PROPOSAL > >> > >> TITLE: W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group > >> > >> ABSTRACT: > >> > >> The Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (SDW WG) is a joint initiative > >> of the > >> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) > >> aiming > >> to bridge the geospatial technologies and the Web, thus facilitating the > >> publication and use of spatial data across platforms and communities. > >> > >> In order to achieve this, the SDW WG is working on a set of > >> deliverables, described in the WG Charter > >> (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter), covering best practices for > >> the publication of spatial data on the Web, based on identified use > >> cases and requirements, plus the standardisation of a set of ontologies > >> (Time Ontology, Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary, Coverages in > >> Linked Data). > >> > >> The workshop is meant to illustrate the work done so far, by providing > >> an overview of the current version of the deliverables, and to collect > >> feedback from participants on the proposed solutions and open issues. > >> > >> AGENDA: > >> > >> - Introduction & purpose of the workshop > >> - Background and objectives of the SDW WG > >> - Overview of SDW WG deliverables > >> - Breakout sessions > >> - Summary from breakout sessions & conclusions > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> > >> On 09/06/2016 19:09, Clemens Portele wrote: > >>> Andrea, > >>> > >>> while I will likely be in Barcelona on Tuesday and Friday morning, do > >>> not make the planning dependent on me. There are other submissions that > >>> I am involved in and I expect to be already quite busy during the week. > >>> If I do not have a session conflict I will attend the workshop and > >>> contribute to the discussion as good as possible, but right now I > cannot > >>> commit to a more active role. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Clemens > >>> > >>> On 9 June 2016 at 15:24:41, Andrea Perego > >>> (andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu > >) > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Jon, Clemens, Ed, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for your mails! > >>>> > >>>> So, the preference for the workshop would be: > >>>> - 1st choice: Friday (morning?), 1.5 hours > >>>> - 2nd choice: Tuesday morning, 1.5 hours > >>>> > >>>> @Jon, @Clemens, would both dates suit you well? > >>>> > >>>> About the agenda, I wonder what you think should be included. > >>>> > >>>> Just trying a possible outline: > >>>> > >>>> - Introduction to SDW WG & purpose of the workshop > >>>> - Overview of deliverables > >>>> - Breakout sessions on selected topics from BP / UCR & SDW ontologies > >>>> - Summary of breakout sessions & conclusions > >>>> > >>>> Covering all the deliverables in 1.5 hours is probably too much, but > >>>> the > >>>> agenda & the discussion topics could be refined based on the > >>>> outcomes of > >>>> the f2f at the TPAC. > >>>> > >>>> Does this make sense to you? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> Andrea > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 09/06/2016 10:17, Ed Parsons wrote: > >>>> > HI Andrea, > >>>> > > >>>> > I can be there with a probability of 1.0 on the 30th, 0.7 on the > >>>> 27th, > >>>> > 0.1 on the 26th ! > >>>> > > >>>> > Ed > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 21:57 Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk > >>>> > <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > I will probably be there (75% confidence level), but not all week. > >>>> > > >>>> > Cheers, > >>>> > Jon > >>>> > > >>>> > > On 8 Jun 2016, at 20:50, Andrea Perego > >>>> > <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu > >>>> > <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Dear all, > >>>> > > > >>>> > > During today's call [1], we briefly discussed the option of > >>>> > submitting a workshop proposal to INSPIRE 2016, considering also > >>>> > that this would be an opportunity to get feedback on the new > >>>> > versions of the deliverables. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > May I ask you who from the WG plans to be at the INSPIRE > >>>> > conference? According to the draft programme [2], time slots for the > >>>> > workshops are 1.5 hour, and are scheduled on Monday (26th), Tuesday > >>>> > morning (27th), and Friday (30th). > >>>> > > > >>>> > > NB: I kindly ask you to let me know ASAP, since the deadline for > >>>> > submission if this Friday. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Thanks! > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Andrea > >>>> > > > >>>> > > ---- > >>>> > > [1]https://www.w3.org/2016/06/08-sdw-minutes#item04 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> [2] > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/ovw > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > >> On 08/06/2016 10:37, Andrea Perego wrote: > >>>> > >> Thanks, Kerry. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> I would like to add another item to the agenda, following up from > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-sdw-minutes#item02 > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> As you know, the INSPIRE conference this year will be in > >>>> Barcelona, > >>>> > >> right after the W3C TPAC: > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/ > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> We (JRC) think it would be good to present the work done by the > >>>> > SDW WG, > >>>> > >> and collect feedback. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> So, I wonder whether we can devote 5 minutes to discuss the > >>>> > possibility > >>>> > >> of proposing a workshop during today's call. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> The deadline for submission is quite close (June, 10th), but we > >>>> just > >>>> > >> need a short abstract (max 400 words) and filling in a template > >>>> [1]. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Thanks in advance > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Andrea > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> ---- > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > >>>> [1] > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/Workshop_template_2016.doc > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >>> On 07/06/2016 14:20, Kerry Taylor wrote: > >>>> > >>> G’day, > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> The full SDW meeting this week will be held at the usual time > >>>> > and place: > >>>> > >>> *8 June 2016 13:00 GMT > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > > >>>> < > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SDWWG+Call&iso=20160608T13&p1=1440&ah=1 > >* > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> Agenda: > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> 1. ISSUE-18 model reuse > >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and ISSUE-19 > >>>> > >>> Multiple types of coverage > >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19> and Related > >>>> > >>> actions (ACTION-114 and ACTION-115) > >>>> > >>> 2. ISSUE-32 Independence of reference systems > >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32> > >>>> > >>> 3. F2F meeting plan > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon> > >>>> > >>> 4. UCR completion > >>>> > >>> 5. Spatial ontology: next steps > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> More details and dial-in instructions: > >>>> > >>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160608 > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> --Kerry & Ed > >>>> > > > >>>> > > -- > >>>> > > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > >>>> > > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > >>>> > > European Commission DG JRC > >>>> > > Institute for Environment & Sustainability > >>>> > > Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data > >>>> > > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > >>>> > > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > >>>> > > > >>>> > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > > >>>> > *Ed Parsons *FRGS > >>>> > Geospatial Technologist, Google > >>>> > > >>>> > Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <020%207881%204501> > >>>> > www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com> @edparsons > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > >>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer > >>>> European Commission DG JRC > >>>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability > >>>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data > >>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > >>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > >>>> > >>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > >> > > > > -- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > European Commission DG JRC > Directorate B - Growth and Innovation > Unit B6 - Digital Economy > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. > -- *Ed Parsons *FRGS Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 09:28:02 UTC