- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:17:54 +0200
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 10:18:29 UTC
Hello, A note for everyone (especially document editors) referencing requirements from the Use Cases and Requirements document: When reading the draft of the note Publishing and Using Earth Observation Data with the RDF Data Cube and the Discrete Global Grid System <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb> I noticed that requirements in the UC&R document are referred to by number, e.g. [Req 5.40 <https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-ucr/#SpatialMetadata>]. I would like to point out that fragment identifiers (e.g. #SpatialMetadata) can be considered stable, but the numbering of the requirements is not. Section numbering is handled by ReSpec and can change when requirements are added or removed. So it is better to refer to them by their title, which should be short enough. For example: Spatial metadata <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialMetadata> , spatial metadata requirement <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialMetadata> . Regards, Frans
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 10:18:29 UTC