- From: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:04:57 +0000
- To: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- CC: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "SDW WG Public List" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Message-ID: <0F77E3EB-36AB-4066-88BE-9389D9B91F08@interactive-instruments.de>
Ed, fine with me, I can be the "scribe" and record the feedback that we get. Clemens On 28 Sep 2016, at 11:27, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com<mailto:eparsons@google.com>> wrote: Thanks Guys, Looks Good, how would you like the feedback collected ? Should we just take notes or would you like something more structured ? Clemens, I'm happy to MC the session if you want to collect the feedback ? Ed On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 09:58 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote: Dear Ed, all, As agreed in Lisbon, we drafted a programme for the SDW Workshop at the INSPIRE 2016 conference, which is now available on the WG wiki: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Background_.26_purpose_of_workshop Because of time constraints (1.5h), the idea is to focus the discussion on the BP deliverable, in particular on those BPs we see as most relevant to the audience (these are listed in the wiki page). We think it would be relevant to get feedback both from the people already doing "spatial data on the Web" (do the BPs provide a good enough coverage of the issues they had to face and the solutions they adopted?), and those who plan to do them (do the BPs provide clear enough guidance on how to do that?) The idea is also to explain that we're trying to "crack open" their datasets, so that each individual "data item" (spatial thing) is addressable in the Web's information space. Do you think this make sense? The wiki page includes also a tentative agenda. Probably, to get feedback in a more effective way, it would good to have break out sessions on the selected BPs, but I don't know if this is feasible, and it probably depends on how many people will join the workshop. When we had the SDW workshop at INSPIRE 2014 in Aalborg, we had around 150 people attending, and this year we have around 1,000 participants at the INSPIRE conference (more than in 2014). However, since the workshop is on Friday, we may have a smaller audience. Thanks! Linda, Jeremy and Andrea On 05/08/2016 15:07, Andrea Perego wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > This is to let you know that the SDW workshop proposal for INSPIRE 2016 > has been accepted, and it is scheduled on Friday, Sep, 30th, at 9AM: > > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/wsl > > Cheers, > > Andrea > > On 10/06/2016 15:58, Andrea Perego wrote: >> Thanks, Clemens. >> >> This being the situation, probably we should consider having an oral >> presentation, in case it won't be actually possible to run a workshop. >> >> Meanwhile, I submitted a draft proposal. I include below the relevant >> parts for you to review. Please change it as you see fit. >> >> Thanks >> >> Andrea >> >> ---- >> >> WORKSHOP PROPOSAL >> >> TITLE: W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group >> >> ABSTRACT: >> >> The Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (SDW WG) is a joint initiative >> of the >> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) >> aiming >> to bridge the geospatial technologies and the Web, thus facilitating the >> publication and use of spatial data across platforms and communities. >> >> In order to achieve this, the SDW WG is working on a set of >> deliverables, described in the WG Charter >> (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter), covering best practices for >> the publication of spatial data on the Web, based on identified use >> cases and requirements, plus the standardisation of a set of ontologies >> (Time Ontology, Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary, Coverages in >> Linked Data). >> >> The workshop is meant to illustrate the work done so far, by providing >> an overview of the current version of the deliverables, and to collect >> feedback from participants on the proposed solutions and open issues. >> >> AGENDA: >> >> - Introduction & purpose of the workshop >> - Background and objectives of the SDW WG >> - Overview of SDW WG deliverables >> - Breakout sessions >> - Summary from breakout sessions & conclusions >> >> ---- >> >> >> On 09/06/2016 19:09, Clemens Portele wrote: >>> Andrea, >>> >>> while I will likely be in Barcelona on Tuesday and Friday morning, do >>> not make the planning dependent on me. There are other submissions that >>> I am involved in and I expect to be already quite busy during the week. >>> If I do not have a session conflict I will attend the workshop and >>> contribute to the discussion as good as possible, but right now I cannot >>> commit to a more active role. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Clemens >>> >>> On 9 June 2016 at 15:24:41, Andrea Perego >>> (andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>) >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Jon, Clemens, Ed, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your mails! >>>> >>>> So, the preference for the workshop would be: >>>> - 1st choice: Friday (morning?), 1.5 hours >>>> - 2nd choice: Tuesday morning, 1.5 hours >>>> >>>> @Jon, @Clemens, would both dates suit you well? >>>> >>>> About the agenda, I wonder what you think should be included. >>>> >>>> Just trying a possible outline: >>>> >>>> - Introduction to SDW WG & purpose of the workshop >>>> - Overview of deliverables >>>> - Breakout sessions on selected topics from BP / UCR & SDW ontologies >>>> - Summary of breakout sessions & conclusions >>>> >>>> Covering all the deliverables in 1.5 hours is probably too much, but >>>> the >>>> agenda & the discussion topics could be refined based on the >>>> outcomes of >>>> the f2f at the TPAC. >>>> >>>> Does this make sense to you? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Andrea >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/06/2016 10:17, Ed Parsons wrote: >>>> > HI Andrea, >>>> > >>>> > I can be there with a probability of 1.0 on the 30th, 0.7 on the >>>> 27th, >>>> > 0.1 on the 26th ! >>>> > >>>> > Ed >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 21:57 Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk<mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> >>>> > <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk<mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I will probably be there (75% confidence level), but not all week. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Jon >>>> > >>>> > > On 8 Jun 2016, at 20:50, Andrea Perego >>>> > <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>> > <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Dear all, >>>> > > >>>> > > During today's call [1], we briefly discussed the option of >>>> > submitting a workshop proposal to INSPIRE 2016, considering also >>>> > that this would be an opportunity to get feedback on the new >>>> > versions of the deliverables. >>>> > > >>>> > > May I ask you who from the WG plans to be at the INSPIRE >>>> > conference? According to the draft programme [2], time slots for the >>>> > workshops are 1.5 hour, and are scheduled on Monday (26th), Tuesday >>>> > morning (27th), and Friday (30th). >>>> > > >>>> > > NB: I kindly ask you to let me know ASAP, since the deadline for >>>> > submission if this Friday. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks! >>>> > > >>>> > > Andrea >>>> > > >>>> > > ---- >>>> > > [1]https://www.w3.org/2016/06/08-sdw-minutes#item04 >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> [2]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/ovw >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >> On 08/06/2016 10:37, Andrea Perego wrote: >>>> > >> Thanks, Kerry. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> I would like to add another item to the agenda, following up from >>>> > >> >>>> > >> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-sdw-minutes#item02 >>>> > >> >>>> > >> As you know, the INSPIRE conference this year will be in >>>> Barcelona, >>>> > >> right after the W3C TPAC: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/ >>>> > >> >>>> > >> We (JRC) think it would be good to present the work done by the >>>> > SDW WG, >>>> > >> and collect feedback. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> So, I wonder whether we can devote 5 minutes to discuss the >>>> > possibility >>>> > >> of proposing a workshop during today's call. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> The deadline for submission is quite close (June, 10th), but we >>>> just >>>> > >> need a short abstract (max 400 words) and filling in a template >>>> [1]. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Thanks in advance >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Andrea >>>> > >> >>>> > >> ---- >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> [1]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/Workshop_template_2016.doc >>>> >>>> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> On 07/06/2016 14:20, Kerry Taylor wrote: >>>> > >>> G’day, >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> The full SDW meeting this week will be held at the usual time >>>> > and place: >>>> > >>> *8 June 2016 13:00 GMT >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SDWWG+Call&iso=20160608T13&p1=1440&ah=1>* >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Agenda: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> 1. ISSUE-18 model reuse >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and ISSUE-19 >>>> > >>> Multiple types of coverage >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19> and Related >>>> > >>> actions (ACTION-114 and ACTION-115) >>>> > >>> 2. ISSUE-32 Independence of reference systems >>>> > >>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32> >>>> > >>> 3. F2F meeting plan >>>> > >>> >>>> > <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon> >>>> > >>> 4. UCR completion >>>> > >>> 5. Spatial ontology: next steps >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> More details and dial-in instructions: >>>> > >>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160608 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> --Kerry & Ed >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>> > > Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>> > > European Commission DG JRC >>>> > > Institute for Environment & Sustainability >>>> > > Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data >>>> > > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>> > > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>> > > >>>> > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > *Ed Parsons *FRGS >>>> > Geospatial Technologist, Google >>>> > >>>> > Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501<tel:020%207881%204501> >>>> > www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/>> @edparsons >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>> European Commission DG JRC >>>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability >>>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data >>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>> >>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >> > -- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. -- Ed Parsons FRGS Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501<tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501> www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 10:05:34 UTC