public-sdw-wg@w3.org from September 2016 by author

Andrea Perego

• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: Fragment identifiers in SDWWG deliverables (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: BP restructuring: Metadata section (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)

Andreas Harth

• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Thursday, 22 September)

Antoine Zimmermann

• New participant to the WG (Tuesday, 13 September)

Armin Haller

• [ssn] Generic Sensor API - SOSA Core alignment (Friday, 30 September)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: Best Practice preparation for TPAC (Sunday, 18 September)

Bill Roberts

• coverage call this week? (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Lisbon timings (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)

Bruce Bannerman

• Re: updates to the Best Practice document [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Sunday, 4 September)

Byron Cochrane

• RE: The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document (Monday, 12 September)
• RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• RE: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Tuesday, 6 September)
• RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Monday, 5 September)
• RE: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Clemens Portele

• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Thursday, 1 September)

Dmitry Brizhinev

• Re: Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)

Ed Parsons

• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: New member: short introduction (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: New participant to the WG (Tuesday, 13 September)
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting.. (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Frans Knibbe

• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Friday, 23 September)
• Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Friday, 23 September)
• Fwd: Requirement for topological data? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: The real size of Africa (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (Wednesday, 14 September)
• My comments on the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• Use Cases and Requirements: current status & preparation for TPAC (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation (Monday, 12 September)
• UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 9 September)
• UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirement in scope? (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirement in scope? (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Friday, 2 September)
• New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• New SSN requirement: SSN usage examples (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation (Sunday, 25 September)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Tuesday, 27 September)
• no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Thursday, 8 September)
• updates to the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Monday, 5 September)
• agenda for BP call this week; 14:00 UTC on Wed 7-Sep (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Jon Blower

• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: sdw coverage meeting this week (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: [ssn] Generic Sensor API - SOSA Core alignment (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Requirement for topological data? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Kerry Taylor

• RE: Some errors in the discussion of SSN (Wednesday, 28 September)
• RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard (Wednesday, 28 September)
• RE: Joint session on vocabulary with Web of Things (Wednesday, 28 September)
• [sdw] namespaces https or http? (Tuesday, 27 September)
• RE: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo (Monday, 26 September)
• [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward (Monday, 26 September)
• [sdw] ssn meeting this week (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: fixing ssn (Monday, 12 September)
• fixing ssn (Sunday, 11 September)
• sdw coverage meeting this week (Monday, 5 September)
• ssn meeting this week (Monday, 5 September)

Krzysztof Janowicz

• Re: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: The real size of Africa (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: fixing ssn (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: fixing ssn (Sunday, 11 September)
• Re: SSN/SOSA/O&M: is an observation an event, activity, or information object? (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: ssn meeting this week (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)

Linda van den Brink

• RE: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Thursday, 29 September)
• RE: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Geonovum testbed reports (Monday, 26 September)
• The real size of Africa (Thursday, 15 September)
• Best Practice preparation for TPAC (Wednesday, 14 September)

Little, Chris

• RE: [sdw] coverage meeting times going forward (Tuesday, 27 September)
• RE: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Maxime LEFRANCOIS

• Re: New member: short introduction (Friday, 16 September)
• New member: short introduction (Thursday, 15 September)

Maxime Lefrançois

• SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: Rob's approach (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation (Friday, 23 September)
• Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Some errors in the discussion of SSN (Thursday, 22 September)

Phil Archer

• Re: Some errors in the discussion of SSN (Wednesday, 28 September)
• [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-20 (Wednesday, 21 September)
• [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-19 (Tuesday, 20 September)
• Apologies for absence this week and next (Monday, 5 September)

Raphaël Troncy

• Re: [w3c/sdw] SSN / SOSA / Activity Hierarchy (#309) (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)

Rob Atkinson

• Re: Fragment identifiers in SDWWG deliverables (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Referencing UCR requirements in other documents: not by number (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: [sdw] ssn meeting this week (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: coverage call this week? (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: explanation (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Exposure of the modularized SSN ontology as different files: demo (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Requirement for topological data? (Friday, 23 September)
• Lisbon timings (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)
• QB4ST example (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: Fuzzy Spatial relations - was RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Sunday, 4 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Thursday, 1 September)

s.kolozali@surrey.ac.uk

• Re: ssn meeting this week (Monday, 5 September)

Scott Simmons

• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [sdw] ssn implementations need for rec track/standard (Thursday, 29 September)
• regrets for 2 weeks (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting.. (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: ssn meeting this week (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations" (Friday, 2 September)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• SDW SSN meeting (Tuesday, 27 September)
• SDW SSN meeting (Tuesday, 27 September)
• RE: Some comments on the spatial ontology (sdwgeo) (Monday, 26 September)
• Some errors in the discussion of SSN (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: updates to the Best Practice document [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document (Wednesday, 14 September)
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document (Thursday, 8 September)
• RE: updates to the Best Practice document (Thursday, 8 September)
• RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision (Monday, 5 September)
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Monday, 5 September)
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Sunday, 4 September)
• RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Difference between W3C Basic Geo "spatial thing" and sdwgeo "spatial thing" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things" (Friday, 2 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Friday, 2 September)
• Spatial relations - was RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)
• RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions" (Thursday, 1 September)

Svensson, Lars

• RE: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Tuesday, 27 September)
• RE: Content negotiation of spatial linked data (Thursday, 22 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 13:45:13 UTC