Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016

IRC makes sense during a meeting, but in this case I think capturing the feedback in an email to the list should be sufficient?

Clemens


On 28 Sep 2016, at 14:49, Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote:

Notes / IRC sound good to me. Basically - if you collect (valuable) input for the BP doc, we editors need to know what that is. If the input comes from a specific person / organisation it would be good to ask if we could follow up later to clarify ... so please get contact details :-)

J


_______________________________________________________________________
Jeremy Tandy | Technology Fellow
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom
email: jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> | web: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/>

See our guide to climate change at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate change/guide/

On 28 Sep 2016, at 13:47, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote:

' Thanks, Ed.

I think that notes would be perfectly fine - and maybe they can be
logged in the IRC (wifi permitting).

But maybe Linda and Jeremy have different preferences.

Andrea


On 28/09/2016 11:27, Ed Parsons wrote:
Thanks Guys,

Looks Good, how would you like the feedback collected ? Should we just
take notes or would you like something more structured ?

Clemens, I'm happy to MC the session if you want to collect the feedback ?

Ed


On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 09:58 Andrea Perego
<andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>
wrote:

   Dear Ed, all,

   As agreed in Lisbon, we drafted a programme for the SDW Workshop at the
   INSPIRE 2016 conference, which is now available on the WG wiki:

   https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Background_.26_purpose_of_workshop


   Because of time constraints (1.5h), the idea is to focus the discussion
   on the BP deliverable, in particular on those BPs we see as most
   relevant to the audience (these are listed in the wiki page).

   We think it would be relevant to get feedback both from the people
   already doing "spatial data on the Web" (do the BPs provide a good
   enough coverage of the issues they had to face and the solutions they
   adopted?), and those who plan to do them (do the BPs provide clear
   enough guidance on how to do that?)

   The idea is also to explain that we're trying to "crack open" their
   datasets, so that each individual "data item" (spatial thing) is
   addressable in the Web's information space.

   Do you think this make sense?

   The wiki page includes also a tentative agenda. Probably, to get
   feedback in a more effective way, it would good to have break out
   sessions on the selected BPs, but I don't know if this is feasible, and
   it probably depends on how many people will join the workshop. When we
   had the SDW workshop at INSPIRE 2014 in Aalborg, we had around 150
   people attending, and this year we have around 1,000 participants at the
   INSPIRE conference (more than in 2014). However, since the workshop is
   on Friday, we may have a smaller audience.

   Thanks!

   Linda, Jeremy and Andrea



   On 05/08/2016 15:07, Andrea Perego wrote:
Dear colleagues,

This is to let you know that the SDW workshop proposal for INSPIRE
   2016
has been accepted, and it is scheduled on Friday, Sep, 30th, at 9AM:

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/wsl


Cheers,

Andrea

On 10/06/2016 15:58, Andrea Perego wrote:
Thanks, Clemens.

This being the situation, probably we should consider having an oral
presentation, in case it won't be actually possible to run a
   workshop.

Meanwhile, I submitted a draft proposal. I include below the relevant
parts for you to review. Please change it as you see fit.

Thanks

Andrea

----

WORKSHOP PROPOSAL

TITLE: W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group

ABSTRACT:

The Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (SDW WG) is a joint
   initiative
of the
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Open Geospatial
   Consortium (OGC)
aiming
to bridge the geospatial technologies and the Web, thus
   facilitating the
publication and use of spatial data across platforms and communities.

In order to achieve this, the SDW WG is working on a set of
deliverables, described in the WG Charter
(https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter), covering best
   practices for
the publication of spatial data on the Web, based on identified use
cases and requirements, plus the standardisation of a set of
   ontologies
(Time Ontology, Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary, Coverages in
Linked Data).

The workshop is meant to illustrate the work done so far, by
   providing
an overview of the current version of the deliverables, and to
   collect
feedback from participants on the proposed solutions and open issues.

AGENDA:

- Introduction & purpose of the workshop
- Background and objectives of the SDW WG
- Overview of SDW WG deliverables
- Breakout sessions
- Summary from breakout sessions & conclusions

----


On 09/06/2016 19:09, Clemens Portele wrote:
Andrea,

while I will likely be in Barcelona on Tuesday and Friday
   morning, do
not make the planning dependent on me. There are other
   submissions that
I am involved in and I expect to be already quite busy during
   the week.
If I do not have a session conflict I will attend the workshop and
contribute to the discussion as good as possible, but right now
   I cannot
commit to a more active role.

Best regards,
Clemens

On 9 June 2016 at 15:24:41, Andrea Perego
(andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
   <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
   <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu
   <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>)
wrote:

Jon, Clemens, Ed,

Thanks for your mails!

So, the preference for the workshop would be:
- 1st choice: Friday (morning?), 1.5 hours
- 2nd choice: Tuesday morning, 1.5 hours

@Jon, @Clemens, would both dates suit you well?

About the agenda, I wonder what you think should be included.

Just trying a possible outline:

- Introduction to SDW WG & purpose of the workshop
- Overview of deliverables
- Breakout sessions on selected topics from BP / UCR & SDW
   ontologies
- Summary of breakout sessions & conclusions

Covering all the deliverables in 1.5 hours is probably too
   much, but
the
agenda & the discussion topics could be refined based on the
outcomes of
the f2f at the TPAC.

Does this make sense to you?

Thanks!

Andrea


On 09/06/2016 10:17, Ed Parsons wrote:
HI Andrea,

I can be there with a probability of 1.0 on the 30th, 0.7 on the
27th,
0.1 on the 26th !

Ed


On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 21:57 Jon Blower
   <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk<mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>
<mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk
   <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>>> wrote:

I will probably be there (75% confidence level), but not all
   week.

Cheers,
Jon

On 8 Jun 2016, at 20:50, Andrea Perego
<andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
   <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu
   <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>> wrote:

Dear all,

During today's call [1], we briefly discussed the option of
submitting a workshop proposal to INSPIRE 2016, considering also
that this would be an opportunity to get feedback on the new
versions of the deliverables.

May I ask you who from the WG plans to be at the INSPIRE
conference? According to the draft programme [2], time slots
   for the
workshops are 1.5 hour, and are scheduled on Monday (26th),
   Tuesday
morning (27th), and Friday (30th).

NB: I kindly ask you to let me know ASAP, since the
   deadline for
submission if this Friday.

Thanks!

Andrea

----
[1]https://www.w3.org/2016/06/08-sdw-minutes#item04




   [2]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/ovw



On 08/06/2016 10:37, Andrea Perego wrote:
Thanks, Kerry.

I would like to add another item to the agenda, following
   up from

https://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-sdw-minutes#item02


As you know, the INSPIRE conference this year will be in
Barcelona,
right after the W3C TPAC:

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/


We (JRC) think it would be good to present the work done
   by the
SDW WG,
and collect feedback.

So, I wonder whether we can devote 5 minutes to discuss the
possibility
of proposing a workshop during today's call.

The deadline for submission is quite close (June, 10th),
   but we
just
need a short abstract (max 400 words) and filling in a
   template
[1].

Thanks in advance

Andrea

----



   [1]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/Workshop_template_2016.doc






On 07/06/2016 14:20, Kerry Taylor wrote:
G’day,

The full SDW meeting this week will be held at the usual time
and place:
*8 June 2016 13:00 GMT



   <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SDWWG+Call&iso=20160608T13&p1=1440&ah=1>*




Agenda:

1. ISSUE-18 model reuse
<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and
   ISSUE-19
Multiple types of coverage
<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19> and Related
actions (ACTION-114 and ACTION-115)
2. ISSUE-32 Independence of reference systems
<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32>
3. F2F meeting plan


   <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon>
4. UCR completion
5. Spatial ontology: next steps

More details and dial-in instructions:
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160608


--Kerry & Ed

--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/



--

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:020%207881%204501>
www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/>>
   <http://www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/>> @edparsons


--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/




   --
   Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
   Scientific / Technical Project Officer
   European Commission DG JRC
   Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
   Unit B6 - Digital Economy
   Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
   21027 Ispra VA, Italy

   https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


   ----
   The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
   not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
   position of the European Commission.

--

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons


--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.