RE: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release

I have closed any issues that are resolved or are no longer relevant because of the restructuring and consolidation of the best practices.

There are quite some open issues still to be addressed; this is clear from the BP draft. Some open issues are perhaps solved by changes in the text, but review is needed before we close them (like the issues related to RDF bias).

Van: Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 27 september 2016 17:11
Aan: Andrea Perego
CC: SDW WG Public List
Onderwerp: Re: no BP sub-group call this week - busy prepping WD release

Thanks!

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 at 16:10 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.

I'll do my best to carry out the review within tomorrow.

Cheers,

Andrea


On 27/09/2016 11:57, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
> Hi- at the f2f meeting at TPAC last week, we made loads of progress ...
> not least was agreeing that the BP doc has changed so much that we
> should release it _now_ (more or less) even though we know there's still
> so much to do to get it _finished_.
>
> Here are my notes from the discussion about WD release:
>
> ```
>
> /@phila: urges publication with only minimal change … there’s been a
> huge amount of work done and we should share this for wider review/
>
> /What to do:/
>
>   * /terminology … making sure that we use spatial thing consistently …
>     [LvdB … fixed already][Andrea to check again?]/
>
>   * /glossary … make sure we have glossary terms for everything that
>     experts might say - and make sure that the glossary definitions are
>     appropriate [@bill]/
>
>   * /bibliography [@phila] … and figure out if we should use a simple
>     hyperlink in place of a bib-ref/
>
>   * /close issues that we have actually resolved [lvdb]/
>
>   * /remove the yellow highlight [@jtandy]/
>
>   * /status of this document [@jtandy]/
>
>   * /change since last release (“substantial re-write”) … therefore
>     don’t need a Diff [@jtandy]/
>
>   * /update to REQ vs BP … could be automated [@newton (from DWBP WG)]/
>
> /…/
>
> /stable version on 5-Oct (wed call)/
>
> /vote to release 12-Oct /
>
> ```
>
> So we have a bunch of editorial actions to do to make a stable release
> for 5-Oct (next week) and then (hopefully) a vote to release the week after.
>
>
> If you've got actions (me, linda, bill, phila, andrea) then please crack
> on with them. Please ask if you have questions ...
>
>
> We're also expecting some additional content from Payam regarding CRS.
>
> Best Regards, Jeremy
>
>
> (from Devon, UK - where the weather isn't nearly so nice as in Lisbon!)
>

--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.