public-poe-archives@w3.org from June 2017 by date

Friday, 30 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses benedictws via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Processor & Test Suite Phil Archer via GitHub
• [poe] Pull Request: Initial stab at definition of an ODRL Evaluator Phil Archer via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction simon via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Requirements of Agreement Policies marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] not all contraint operators are logical operators Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 29 June 2017

• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM wording for classes and their relationships Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM wording for classes and their relationships Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] @uid vs @id Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Model clarifications marked as Needs WG Decision Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses marked as Model Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM wording for classes and their relationships Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM wording for classes and their relationships Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Note on Policy Inference marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 26 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by iherman Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by iherman Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense marked as Model simon via GitHub
• [poe] EXAMPLE 19 makes no sense simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction marked as Model simon via GitHub
• [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Constraint Narrative marked as invalid simon via GitHub
• [poe] Constraint Narrative simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section marked as Model Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference simon via GitHub

Sunday, 25 June 2017

• [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub

Saturday, 24 June 2017

• [poe] Note on Policy Inference Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Michael Steidl via GitHub

Friday, 23 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: IM wording for class relationships marked as Model Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] IM wording for class relationships Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Phil Archer via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Duplicates in Vocabulary marked as Vocab Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Vocab clarifications marked as Needs WG Decision Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] not all contraint operators are logical operators Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 22 June 2017

• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Phil Archer via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 21 June 2017

• Closed: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Vocab feedback Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 20 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Ivan Herman via GitHub

Monday, 19 June 2017

• [poe] Issue: Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? marked as enhancement Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] XML Schema design Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: XML Schema design marked as XML Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by sereAbi Serena Villata via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by sereAbi Serena Villata via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by sereAbi Serena Villata via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Checking the dynamic use of partOf marked as question Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear marked as Model Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Mechanism for specifying constraints marked as To Be Closed Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Vocab Editorial Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] not all contraint operators are logical operators Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: not all contraint operators are logical operators marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub

Sunday, 18 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub

Friday, 16 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Vocab Editorial aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• [poe] not all contraint operators are logical operators simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies simon via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Model Comments/Feedback (PhilA) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Normative and non-normative parties, actions, leftOperands, operators ... Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Remove Scope - replace with Constraint Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Definitions of Atomic Constraint Operators Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Constraint: specs of classes and of instances of LeftOperand - editorial issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Actions (Permission/Prohibition and Duty) - editorial issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Difference between Policy Types and Rule Types Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Vocab terms "to an audience" Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] what is the authoritative 'formal' definition? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] consistency of definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Support JSON-LD Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] A Party MUST have the function role fulfilled by a Party Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] An Action is associated to the Asset with the action property in a Rule. Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] XML encoding: qcodes and qnames Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] What does Policy merge means (model document) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] What properties are used with which classes? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: @uid vs @id marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 15 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Use of "agent" in the definition of "Party" Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Note on Duty Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Action names to be used Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Action names to be used Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 14 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Use of "agent" in the definition of "Party" Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Note on Duty Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Action names to be used Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Synchronize (addition to vocab) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Synchronize (addition to vocab) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Should vs must in some odrl:LeftOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Should vs must in some odrl:LeftOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 13 June 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Should vs must in some odrl:LeftOperand Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent marked as bug Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 12 June 2017

• [poe] Issue: Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements marked as Editorial Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Modelling duty/obligation marked as Wide Review Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? simon via GitHub
• [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] JSON-LD Encoding Renato Iannella via GitHub

Saturday, 10 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub

Friday, 9 June 2017

• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: whats's the rationale behind uids? marked as Needs WG Discussion Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 8 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Vocab Time examples Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 6 June 2017

• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab Editorial aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] 1.4 Terminology Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: What does Policy merge means (model document) marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: what is the authoritative 'formal' definition? marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Support JSON-LD marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: consistency of definitions marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: A Party MUST have the function role fulfilled by a Party marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: An Action is associated to the Asset with the action property in a Rule. marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: XML encoding: qcodes and qnames marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied? marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: What properties are used with which classes? marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Vocab terms "to an audience" marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Difference between Policy Types and Rule Types marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Actions (Permission/Prohibition and Duty) - editorial issues marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Remove Scope - replace with Constraint marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Normative and non-normative parties, actions, leftOperands, operators ... marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Constraint: specs of classes and of instances of LeftOperand - editorial issues marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Definitions of Atomic Constraint Operators marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: revising vocabulary definitions marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Model Comments/Feedback (PhilA) marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab feedback Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] @uid vs @id Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] whats's the rationale behind uids? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model Comments/Feedback (PhilA) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 5 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Normative and non-normative parties, actions, leftOperands, operators ... Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Normative and non-normative parties, actions, leftOperands, operators ... Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [poe] ODRL Ontology in non-perfect state Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub

Sunday, 4 June 2017

• [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues marked as bug Michael Steidl via GitHub

Saturday, 3 June 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub

Friday, 2 June 2017

• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab Editorial Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Undefined Actions - deprecate? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] ODRL Profiles & RFC2119 Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] odrl:use Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Systematic labeling of normative vs. informative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 1 June 2017

• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Mechanism for specifying constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: JSON-LD Encoding marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2017 16:47:03 UTC