Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements

Re Information Model of 13 June / section 2.4 Action:
The statement "Action terms must be defined using the includedIn property with either use or transfer as the parent term. " does not reflect having a transitive includedIn. Should be like "Action terms must be defined using the includedIn property referring to an encompassing Action and either use or transfer as the top level parent term by transitive means."

Re Vocabulary of 13 June:
The specification tables of Action instances show Included In now but as value only "use" or "transfer". But we have defined in earlier versions that display, play and print have present as encompassing Action and extract has reproduce as encompassing Action. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/192#issuecomment-308019148 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2017 06:23:51 UTC