- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:55:02 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@riannella by which feature of ODRL may an Atomic Constraint of a Rule reference an Atomic Constraint?
Should it look like this reformulated example 15?
```
{
"@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl.jsonld",
"@type": "Offer",
"uid": "http://example.com/policy:6161",
"permission": [{
"target": "http://example.com/wallpaper:1234",
"assigner": "http://example.com/myPix:6161",
"action": "distribute",
"constraint": [{
"leftOperand": "spatial",
"operator": "eq",
"rightOperand": "https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:IT"
}],
"duty": [
{
"action": "compensate",
"constraint": [ "http://example.com/policy:6161/C1" ]
},
{
"action": "nextPolicy",
"target": "http://example.com/policy:7171"
}
]
}],
"constraint": [{
"uid": "http://example.com/policy:6161/C1",
"leftOperand": "spatial",
"operator": "eq",
"rightOperand": "https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:IT"
}]
}
```
If yes: how to make this work in XML?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/193#issuecomment-309365826 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 07:55:08 UTC