Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation

hi @fornaran - thanks for your feedback.

You say "...in order to be allowed to use a VALID permission a party must BEFORE satisfy the related Duty" - this is not totally correct. There are some use cases where a Duty could be satisfied after the permission has been actioned (eg stream music and pay at the end of the month).

But I think the wording can be made more clearer in Duty section: http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#duty

I think we update this:

> The Permission is valid (including the Permission's constraints all being satisfied) if and only if the Duty has been fulfilled

to:

> The Permission is valid (including the Permission's constraints all being satisfied) if and only if the Duty has been **or will be** fulfilled

Does that sound more clearer?



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/191#issuecomment-308001879 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2017 04:13:54 UTC