Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications

This is a very good move forward!
Still I would insist that there should be nothing in the spec that encourages people to hijack URIs, which is a bad practice. It's not only about letting users the opportunity to do things in an ok way, it's about discouraging them to do bad things.
But I guess we were almost already there when in your previous comment you suggested that in example 19, the assignee is "". This was good, sorry I didn't react on this. I was in a hurry as the first part of your comment was hinting that I was advocating throwing the baby (constraint mechanism) with the bathwater (hijacking URIs), which was not the case :-)

On 19/06/17 05:52, Renato Iannella wrote:
> The uid has moved to a "Should" now.
> So, this is possible:
> |odrl:assigner [ a odrl:Party ; foaf:name "Bob" ; ] |
> See #174 <>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <>, or mute the thread <>.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 07:22:32 UTC