- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:32:58 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
1) if we follow that model, then XML implementors need to create/maintain two items for the same thing: the URI for the term, and the xml element. The current model, all is needed is the URI for the term (that other serialisations can use too)
Dave Compton at TR is an ODRL XML implementor (from what I have seen). Perhaps ask him what is preference is? Doing this change will break every exisiting xml implementation.
3) I did look at that, but the problem you run into is that this is also a valid policy:
<Policy....>
<asset uid=""/>
<assigner uid="/>
<permission>
<action name=""/>
</permission>
</Policy>
The only option is <xs:assert> rules.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/197#issuecomment-310258751 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 02:33:05 UTC