- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:41:07 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
nitmws has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe: == Checking the dynamic use of partOf == That's the use case: An asset entity uses hasPolicy, the id of this asset is http://example.org/assets/131432. The referred policy (http://example.com/policy:1033) defines as target asset a collection of many assets (http://example.com/assetCollection:8378) intentionally including this asset http://example.org/assets/131432. To check: * MUST this asset be included into the Policy document/resource with a relationship odrl:partOf? * or is it sufficient to state as property of this asset that it is odrl:partOf and the asset's id does not appear in the policy - e.g. (nar: is the namespace of the IPTC News Architecture) ``` # the Policy { "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl.jsonld", "@type": "Offer", "uid": "http://example.com/policy:1033", "permission": [{ "target": "http://example.com/assetCollection:8378", "action": "display", "assigner": "http://example.com/party:0001" }] } # the Asset entity { "@type": "nar:newsItem", "@id": "http://example.org/assets/131432", "nar:headline": "Brexit negotiations have started today", ... "odrl:partOf": "http://example.com/assetCollection:8378", "odrl:hasPolicy": "http://example.com/policy:1033", ... } ``` Such a use case is essential for the news industry as a persistent policy should be able to cover "just created" new news items. A similar use case could apply to Party and PartyCollection - e.g. new students, does each one has to be added to the policy? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/196 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 09:41:13 UTC