Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues

I come back to the hasPolicy definition: despite it is not defined anywhere explicitly a Policy must have at least one Rule, this is what can be said about a Policy. And that at least one of the Rules has the entity using hasProperty as target asset. 
I'm aware that potential ODRL/RightsML users want to keep the number of Policies low, the restriction that all Rules have to use the entity as target asset would increase this number.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/188#issuecomment-309374357 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 08:34:01 UTC