Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues

I come back to the hasPolicy definition: despite it is not defined anywhere explicitly a Policy must have at least one Rule, this is what can be said about a Policy. And that at least one of the Rules has the entity using hasProperty as target asset. 
I'm aware that potential ODRL/RightsML users want to keep the number of Policies low, the restriction that all Rules have to use the entity as target asset would increase this number.

GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 08:34:01 UTC