Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues

The Vocab spec does not mention anything about the SKOS "actions" ConceptScheme (for example). 

I don't think we (even as the Community Group) understood what we wanted from SKOS :-(

Perhaps the best option is to remove the SKOS actions conceptScheme from the ontology and, if there is a demand, we create a NOTE on the proper SKOS-i-fication of ODRL ??

As for the current SKOS collections (use to drive the script to create the spec) - I think we label these as such operational collections, not so much a vocab collection ?
(can we use  skos:hiddenLabel ?)

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2017 01:39:55 UTC