Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications

I am proposing that for the assignee (or any resource that results from the application of constraints) one shouldn't re-use a URI that already has a a different meaning. So either minting a new URI or leaving the assignee anonymous (by leaving it as a blank node).

In any case I am not proposing this instead of the stating the constraints. These are needed for expressing the information. From a machine perspective, these URIs should indeed be considered to be opaque.

Is this clearer?

Btw I am surprised that there is no one in the group that would share the same concern or help us make progress here. It seems like a discussion between the two of us. I mean, we're progressing, but I'm surprised that no one with a Semantic Web background has ever reacted to the matter. I don't feel I'm standing on a super-exotic standpoint. Or am I?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/164#issuecomment-309300416 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 18 June 2017 20:20:06 UTC