Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues

1) hasPolicy -> we can't tell how many Rules there are in the Policy. So we can only say the Asset is the target for **all** the Rules. Will update narrative.

2) So technically we are using skos:collection correctly ;-)
I added some ## comments just before the skos:collections.
And removed the "actions" ConceptScheme (as we have no skos hierarchy defined for them).

commit 385734bce8ffa01da22c99b050f57bb4a6499da2


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/188#issuecomment-307265012 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 00:45:33 UTC