Re: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent

@riannella the /parts/xml.html was update but not the index.html!

Having a look at the commits:
The statement "The Policy element MAY also contain the constraint element to support Compound Constraints" is not clear enough:

* the asset & co are named as plural "... MAY contain ... element_s_ ...". As also multiple <constraint>s may be used they need a plural too.
* "... to support Compound Constraints ..." in which way?? 

I suggest:
The Policy element MAY also contain constraint elements which are Atomic Constraints referenced by  Compound Constraints; but these Atomic Constraints are not a direct constraint of a Rule and therefore not a child element of it.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/193#issuecomment-309290439 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:17:21 UTC