Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements

For DCAT I just wanted to point at how they have documented such things. I.e. DCAT includes a 'title' property, but they say that for this dct:title should be used.

I think this is quite the same situation as when you write "We still note the CC-like terms we defined in ODRL as Actions, but we want them to use the actual CC terms URIs. (so they CC terms are more important, in this case.)"

What is important is that what DCAT recommends is explicit is in the DCAT documentation. Right now there is nothing in the POE documentation that reflects clearly what you say ("we want them to use the actual CC terms URIs. (so they CC terms are more important, in this case"). For example, if I want to allow or prevents commercial use of a resource, there is nothing that points me to https://creativecommons.org/ns#CommercialUse as a valid type of Action I could use.
There is a reference to Commercialize at for example https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-Action but it points directly to https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-commercialize
And this, I'm sorry to say, is not enough. It appears without any context or instruction in the 'deprecated' section, together with terms that are *really* deprecated. So I would think I cannot use it in a valid POE description.
Using the pattern that the DCAT documentation uses for terms re-used from other namespace would be much more efficient, if indeed you want to encourage re-use of CC terms in POE descriptions.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/158#issuecomment-309716033 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 10:46:12 UTC