Re: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties?

We must avoid any statement indicating an assignee/r party and a policy have a direct relationship (in which direction ever). This should be stated only regarding a Rule.
And the same applies to hasPolicy (see #188): no statement about a Policy having a target asset and in the inverse that an Asset is the target of a Policy. Such statement can only be made regarding Rules too.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/190#issuecomment-307370089 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 11:59:07 UTC