Re: [poe] Vocab feedback

I would hope the WG is ok with the current approach for selectors!
I was suggesting to look at re-using exisitng patterns because it's a good practice (see BP15 at
But I also understand if the WG judges it has more pressing issues to solve. I have to reckon I've seen worse cases of lack of ontology duplication, after all.

On 19/06/17 05:49, Renato Iannella wrote:
> The WG seems ok with the current approach. @philarcher1 <> raised the correct use of URIs (a few weeks ago too).
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <>, or mute the thread <>.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 07:24:57 UTC