Re: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues

> @nitmws - is that ok?

it's actually not.. according to:
> Policy -> A non-empty group of Permissions and/or Prohibitions

following ODRL policy of type Set doesn't qualify as a Policy anymore:
    a odrl:Set ;   
    odrl:duty <someduty> .

Long story short 
  -> "A Policy must include at least one Rule."
  -> "Policy = A non-empty group of Rules" (I'm kinda missing hints to additional stuff like conflict/inheritance etc. here)

GitHub Notification of comment by simonstey
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 08:25:38 UTC