- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) makxdekkers via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) pwin via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) David Browning via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) pwin via GitHub (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Thursday, 28 November)
Conneg to PWD3 pedro winstley (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) makxdekkers via GitHub (Sunday, 24 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Sunday, 24 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) David Browning via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) David Browning via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177) David Browning via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
PROF Issue Nicholas Car (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) aisaac via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) aisaac via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) pwin via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) pwin via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) pwin via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Sunday, 3 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) bertvannuffelen via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) aisaac via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) bertvannuffelen via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Karen Coyle via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) aisaac via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) bertvannuffelen via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)
Last message date: Thursday, 28 November 2019 23:50:19 UTC