Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)

@nicholascar Could you say here what the conclusion is? What definitions were included? Because the comments on the PR say that the definitions are not included, so this would then not be due for closing.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1061#issuecomment-558103084 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 25 November 2019 10:57:59 UTC