Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)

@nicholascar I'm not sure which of my comments was intended to be responded to here, so I'll say:

1) the confusing inclusion of elements in the legend that are not in the diagram is resolved
2) I wasn't sure how to read it. In RDF diagrams, properties are generally shown linking to values, not to the range of the value. Since RDF has both domains and ranges the links to classes are ambiguous - if this is intended to show the ranges of the objects of the properties that needs to be made clear. Also, it shows one value (token), which, if this is a class diagram, should be rdfs:literal. 
3) I still argue that dct:format is not appropriate as a property on a node or URI that is not a physical item with a format.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/826#issuecomment-557414269 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 22 November 2019 06:52:40 UTC