Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)

I agree that my examples indicate that addressing DCAT profile conformance might not be obvious and it is hard to estimate its impact. And that there should be more evidence how it might be used in practice. 

Leaving it as it is now means also that the decision on how dct:conformsTo is being interpreted will be left to the users of the vocabulary. I think my examples showed that there are different interpretation possibilities.  

I follow the approach of @rob-metalinkage for adding more formal guidelines w.r.t. the clarifying the impact of the specifying DCAT profile requirements. 
Because, I have the believe that the vocabulary should be able to be interpreted by a machine and in order to have different machines draw the same conclusion, this requires more information about the scope of the statement dct:conformsTo. 

GitHub Notification of comment by bertvannuffelen
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2019 10:37:00 UTC