Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)

@kcoyle - specification of the semantics says nothing about the implementation - it merely means an OWL-DL reasoner _could_ be used.  I'm not really expert enough in OWL reasoning but my expectation is formal semantics and OWL reasoning could be used to test the definitions even if no-one needs to implement this as a run-time behaviour.

Its also easy enough to implement property chains with simple SPARQL CONSTRUCT statements, or a range or other approaches.

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2019 19:54:17 UTC